Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: paramater refactors for data and metadata endio call backs
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:09:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110020909.23438-1-wqu@suse.com> (raw)

This is another cleanup exposed when I'm fixing my subpage patchset.

Dating back to the old time where we still have hooks for data/metadata
endio, we have a parameter called @phy_offset for both hooks.

That @phy_offset is the number of sectors compared to the bio on-disk
bytenr, and is used to grab the csum from btrfs_io_bio.

This is far from straightforward, and costs reader tons of time to grasp
the basic.

This patchset will change it by:
- Remove phy_offset completely for metadata
  Since metadata doesn't use btrfs_io_bio::csums[] at all, there is no
  need for it.

- Use @disk_bytenr to replace @phy_offset/@icsum
  Let the callee, check_data_csum() to calculate the offset from
  @disk_bytenr and bio to get the csum offset.

Changelog:
v2:
- Update commit message to remove the wrong comment on
  btrfs_io_bio->logical
  That logical is mess, it has different meanings for different use
  cases.
  What we should refer to is bio->bi_iter.bi_sector.

- Remove the false-alert prone ASSERT()
  Even at endio time. bio->bi_iter.bi_size can change due to incoming
  finished IOs.
  This means we can't really rely on bio->bi_iter.bi_size to check if
  our disk_bytenr is still valid.

Qu Wenruo (2):
  btrfs: remove the phy_offset parameter for
    btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer()
  btrfs: pass disk_bytenr directly for check_data_csum()

 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c   |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.h   |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 fs/btrfs/inode.c     | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
2.29.2


             reply	other threads:[~2020-11-10  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-10  2:09 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-11-10  2:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: remove the phy_offset parameter for btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer() Qu Wenruo
2020-11-10  2:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: pass disk_bytenr directly for check_data_csum() Qu Wenruo
2020-11-10 15:30   ` Josef Bacik
2020-11-11  0:05     ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201110020909.23438-1-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox