From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: paramater refactors for data and metadata endio call backs
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:09:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110020909.23438-1-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
This is another cleanup exposed when I'm fixing my subpage patchset.
Dating back to the old time where we still have hooks for data/metadata
endio, we have a parameter called @phy_offset for both hooks.
That @phy_offset is the number of sectors compared to the bio on-disk
bytenr, and is used to grab the csum from btrfs_io_bio.
This is far from straightforward, and costs reader tons of time to grasp
the basic.
This patchset will change it by:
- Remove phy_offset completely for metadata
Since metadata doesn't use btrfs_io_bio::csums[] at all, there is no
need for it.
- Use @disk_bytenr to replace @phy_offset/@icsum
Let the callee, check_data_csum() to calculate the offset from
@disk_bytenr and bio to get the csum offset.
Changelog:
v2:
- Update commit message to remove the wrong comment on
btrfs_io_bio->logical
That logical is mess, it has different meanings for different use
cases.
What we should refer to is bio->bi_iter.bi_sector.
- Remove the false-alert prone ASSERT()
Even at endio time. bio->bi_iter.bi_size can change due to incoming
finished IOs.
This means we can't really rely on bio->bi_iter.bi_size to check if
our disk_bytenr is still valid.
Qu Wenruo (2):
btrfs: remove the phy_offset parameter for
btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer()
btrfs: pass disk_bytenr directly for check_data_csum()
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 16 +++++++++-------
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 2:09 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-11-10 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: remove the phy_offset parameter for btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer() Qu Wenruo
2020-11-10 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: pass disk_bytenr directly for check_data_csum() Qu Wenruo
2020-11-10 15:30 ` Josef Bacik
2020-11-11 0:05 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201110020909.23438-1-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox