From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
syzbot+582e66e5edf36a22c7b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] btrfs: don't access possibly stale fs_info data for printing duplicate device
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:36:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120163642.GU20563@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e639c7a057653c1947b3a4acf2fba6c7798000b5.1605690144.git.johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 06:03:26PM +0900, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Syzbot reported a possible use-after-free when printing a duplicate device
> warning device_list_add().
>
> At this point it can happen that a btrfs_device::fs_info is not correctly
> setup yet, so we're accessing stale data, when printing the warning
> message using the btrfs_printk() wrappers.
>
> The syzkaller reproducer for this use-after-free crafts a filesystem image
> and loop mounts it twice in a loop. The mount will fail as the crafted
> image has an invalid chunk tree. When this happens btrfs_mount_root() will
> call deactivate_locked_super(), which then cleans up fs_info and
> fs_info::sb. If a second thread now adds the same block-device to the
> file-system, it will get detected as a duplicate device and
> device_list_add() will reject the duplicate and print a warning. But as
> the fs_info pointer passed in is non-NULL this will result in a
> use-after-free.
>
> Instead of printing possibly uninitialized or already freed memory in
> btrfs_printk(), explicitly pass in a NULL fs_info so the printing of the
> device name will be skipped altogether.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000c9e14b05afcc41ba@google.com
I've added the stacktrace from the link.
> Reported-by: syzbot+582e66e5edf36a22c7b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Added to misc-next, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-18 9:03 [PATCH v3] btrfs: don't access possibly stale fs_info data for printing duplicate device Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-18 9:28 ` Anand Jain
2020-11-20 16:21 ` David Sterba
2020-11-20 16:36 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201120163642.GU20563@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=syzbot+582e66e5edf36a22c7b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox