From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/15] btrfs: extent_io: extract the btree page submission code into its own helper function
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:48:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201202064811.100688-5-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201202064811.100688-1-wqu@suse.com>
In btree_write_cache_pages() we have a btree page submission routine
buried deeply into a nested loop.
This patch will extract that part of code into a helper function,
submit_eb_page(), to do the same work.
Also, since submit_eb_page() now can return >0 for successful extent
buffer submission, remove the "ASSERT(ret <= 0);" line.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index a28b61510265..4b72c824064c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3987,10 +3987,81 @@ static noinline_for_stack int write_one_eb(struct extent_buffer *eb,
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * Submit all page(s) of one extent buffer.
+ *
+ * @page: The page of one extent buffer
+ * @eb_context: To determine if we need to submit this page. If current page
+ * belongs to this eb, we don't need to submit.
+ *
+ * The caller should pass each page in their bytenr order, and here we use
+ * @eb_context to determine if we have submitted pages of one extent buffer.
+ *
+ * If have submitted, we just skip until we hit a new page that doesn't belong
+ * to current @eb_context.
+ *
+ * If not yet submitted, we submit all the page(s) of the extent buffer.
+ *
+ * Return >0 if we have submitted the extent buffer successfully.
+ * Return 0 if we don't need to submit the page, as it's already submitted by
+ * previous call.
+ * Return <0 for fatal error.
+ */
+static int submit_eb_page(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc,
+ struct extent_page_data *epd,
+ struct extent_buffer **eb_context)
+{
+ struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
+ struct extent_buffer *eb;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!PagePrivate(page))
+ return 0;
+
+ spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
+ spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ eb = (struct extent_buffer *)page->private;
+
+ /*
+ * Shouldn't happen and normally this would be a BUG_ON but no sense
+ * in crashing the users box for something we can survive anyway.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON(!eb)) {
+ spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (eb == *eb_context) {
+ spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ ret = atomic_inc_not_zero(&eb->refs);
+ spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ if (!ret)
+ return 0;
+
+ *eb_context = eb;
+
+ ret = lock_extent_buffer_for_io(eb, epd);
+ if (ret <= 0) {
+ free_extent_buffer(eb);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ ret = write_one_eb(eb, wbc, epd);
+ free_extent_buffer(eb);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ return 1;
+}
+
int btree_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
- struct extent_buffer *eb, *prev_eb = NULL;
+ struct extent_buffer *eb_context = NULL;
struct extent_page_data epd = {
.bio = NULL,
.extent_locked = 0,
@@ -4036,55 +4107,13 @@ int btree_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
- if (!PagePrivate(page))
- continue;
-
- spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock);
- if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
- spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
- continue;
- }
-
- eb = (struct extent_buffer *)page->private;
-
- /*
- * Shouldn't happen and normally this would be a BUG_ON
- * but no sense in crashing the users box for something
- * we can survive anyway.
- */
- if (WARN_ON(!eb)) {
- spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
- continue;
- }
-
- if (eb == prev_eb) {
- spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
+ ret = submit_eb_page(page, wbc, &epd, &eb_context);
+ if (ret == 0)
continue;
- }
-
- ret = atomic_inc_not_zero(&eb->refs);
- spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
- if (!ret)
- continue;
-
- prev_eb = eb;
- ret = lock_extent_buffer_for_io(eb, &epd);
- if (!ret) {
- free_extent_buffer(eb);
- continue;
- } else if (ret < 0) {
- done = 1;
- free_extent_buffer(eb);
- break;
- }
-
- ret = write_one_eb(eb, wbc, &epd);
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret < 0) {
done = 1;
- free_extent_buffer(eb);
break;
}
- free_extent_buffer(eb);
/*
* the filesystem may choose to bump up nr_to_write.
@@ -4105,7 +4134,6 @@ int btree_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
index = 0;
goto retry;
}
- ASSERT(ret <= 0);
if (ret < 0) {
end_write_bio(&epd, ret);
return ret;
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-02 6:47 [PATCH v3 00/15] btrfs: preparation patches for subpage support Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] btrfs: rename bio_offset of extent_submit_bio_start_t to opt_file_offset Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-03 18:45 ` David Sterba
2020-12-02 6:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] btrfs: pass bio_offset to check_data_csum() directly Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] btrfs: inode: make btrfs_verify_data_csum() follow sector size Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] btrfs: extent_io: calculate inline extent buffer page size based on page size Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] btrfs: extent_io: don't allow tree block to cross page boundary for subpage support Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] btrfs: extent_io: update num_extent_pages() to support subpage sized extent buffer Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] btrfs: handle sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE case for extent buffer accessors Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] btrfs: file-item: remove the btrfs_find_ordered_sum() call in btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] btrfs: file-item: refactor btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() to handle out-of-order bvecs Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] btrfs: scrub: reduce the width for extent_len/stripe_len from 64 bits to 32 bits Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] btrfs: scrub: always allocate one full page for one sector for RAID56 Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] btrfs: scrub: support subpage tree block scrub Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] btrfs: scrub: support subpage data scrub Qu Wenruo
2020-12-02 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] btrfs: scrub: allow scrub to work with subpage sectorsize Qu Wenruo
2020-12-04 15:18 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] btrfs: preparation patches for subpage support David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201202064811.100688-5-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox