From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Overhaul free objectid code
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 18:08:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201215170823.GY6430@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207153237.1073887-1-nborisov@suse.com>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> This series aims to make the free objectid code more straighforward. Currently
> the highest used objectid is used which implies that when btrfs_get_free_objectid
> is called the pre-increment operator is used. At the same time when looking
> at how highest_objectid is initialised in find_free_objectid it's using the,
> at first looko unusual, 'BTRFS_FREE_OBJECTID - 1'. Furthermore btrfs_find_free_objectid
> is badly named as it's used only in initializaion context.
>
> With the series applied the following is achieved:
> * The 2 functions related to free objectid have better naming which describes
> their semantic meaning.
>
> * highest_objectid is renamed to free_objectid which clearly states what it's
> supposed to hold, also btrfs_get_free_objectid now returns the value and
> does a post-increment which seems more logical than the previous cod.
>
> * Now it's not necessary to re-initialize free_objectid in create_subvol
> since that member is now consistently initialized when a given root is read
> for the first time in btrfs_init_fs_root->btrfs_init_root_free_objectid.
> Additionally in btrfs_init_root_free_objectid free_objectid is now initialized
> to BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID so it's self-explanatory.
>
> This series survived xfstest as well as a new xfstest which verifies precisely
> this functionality.
>
>
> Nikolay Borisov (6):
> btrfs: Rename btrfs_find_highest_objectid to
> btrfs_init_root_free_objectid
> btrfs: Rename btrfs_find_free_objectid to btrfs_get_free_objectid
> btrfs: Remove useless ASSERTS
> btrfs: Rename highest_objectid to free_objectid
> btrfs: Make free_objectid hold the next available objectid in the root
> btrfs: Remove new_dirid argument from btrfs_create_subvol_root
Except patch 3 (the assert) added to misc-next, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-15 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-07 15:32 [PATCH 0/6] Overhaul free objectid code Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-07 15:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: Rename btrfs_find_highest_objectid to btrfs_init_root_free_objectid Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-07 15:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: Rename btrfs_find_free_objectid to btrfs_get_free_objectid Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-07 15:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: Remove useless ASSERTS Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-15 16:58 ` David Sterba
2020-12-15 17:48 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-18 15:03 ` David Sterba
2020-12-07 15:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: Rename highest_objectid to free_objectid Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-07 15:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: Make free_objectid hold the next available objectid in the root Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-07 15:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: Remove new_dirid argument from btrfs_create_subvol_root Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-07 16:19 ` [RESEND PATCH] btrfs: Add test 154 Nikolay Borisov
2020-12-20 14:32 ` Eryu Guan
2020-12-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/6] Overhaul free objectid code Josef Bacik
2020-12-15 17:08 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201215170823.GY6430@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox