From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A03C433DB for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC1D23A7F for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726259AbhANO3i (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:29:38 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34528 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725884AbhANO3h (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:29:37 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61757AE63; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 11DDEDA7EE; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:27:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:27:02 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Chris Murphy Cc: Btrfs BTRFS , David Sterba Subject: Re: btrfs: shrink delalloc pages instead of full inodes, for 5.10.8? Message-ID: <20210114142702.GW6430@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Chris Murphy , Btrfs BTRFS , David Sterba References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 01:13:50AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like this didn't make it to 5.10.7. I see the PR for > 5.11-rc4. Is it likely it'll make it into 5.10.8? 5.10.8 is feasible I think, a minor diff fixup is needed to apply to 5.10.x, I'll send it.