Re: [PATCH 00/13] Serious fixes for different error paths

[David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>]

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 05:44:35PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:22:04AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > A lot of these were in previous versions of the relocation error handling
> > patches.  I added a few since the last go around.  All of these do not rely on
> > the error handling patches, and some of them are quite important otherwise we
> > get corruption if we get errors in certain spots.  There's also a few lockdep
> > fixes and such.  These really need to go in ASAP, regardless of when the
> > relocation error handling patches are merged.  They're mostly small and self
> > contained, the only "big" one being the one that tracks the root owner for
> > relocation reads, which is to resolve the remaining class of lockdep errors we
> > get because of an improper lockdep class set on the extent buffer.  Thanks,
> > 
> > Josef
> > 
> > Josef Bacik (13):
> >   btrfs: don't get an EINTR during drop_snapshot for reloc
> >   btrfs: initialize test inodes location
> >   btrfs: fix reloc root leak with 0 ref reloc roots on recovery
> >   btrfs: splice remaining dirty_bg's onto the transaction dirty bg list
> >   btrfs: do not WARN_ON() if we can't find the reloc root
> >   btrfs: add ASSERT()'s for deleting backref cache nodes
> >   btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error
> >   btrfs: abort the transaction if we fail to inc ref in btrfs_copy_root
> >   btrfs: modify the new_root highest_objectid under a ref count
> >   btrfs: fix lockdep splat in btrfs_recover_relocation
> >   btrfs: keep track of the root owner for relocation reads
> >   btrfs: do not cleanup upper nodes in btrfs_backref_cleanup_node
> >   btrfs: don't clear ret in btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups
> 
> Patch 2 has been merged, patch 9 dropped due to the inode number
> cleanups in "btrfs: make btrfs_root::free_objectid hold the next
> available objectid". Most of them are reviewed, I'll add the series to
> for-next and continue merging to misc-next and then to -rc eventually.
> Thanks.

1, 7, 10-13 added to misc-next.