Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Su Yue <l@damenly.su>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Erhard F <erhard_f@mailbox.org>,
	dave@stgolabs.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep warning due to seqcount_mutex_init() with wrong address
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:03:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210126070311.wusdu3sfi6ywdrzb@offworld> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210125165346.GM1993@twin.jikos.cz>

On Mon, 25 Jan 2021, David Sterba wrote:

>IMO it's not, though some kind of annotation could be useful. The patch
>introducing the seqcount mutex does not mention any warning so it's
>probably meant only for clarity of the lock nesting or maybe real-time
>related as there are some comments regarding that in seqlock.h.

That lockdep_assert_held() is just to verify the writer side is properly
serialized. The real-time aspects here does not apply in that the mutex
is always preemptible.

>
>Even for a dynamic allocation we'd need a way to synchronize setting the
>variable, it could be possible, but the lockdep report needs to be
>fixed. Right now I don't see another way than the revert.

Agreed, let's revert this until a proper workaround is found.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-26 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21 11:39 [PATCH] btrfs: fix lockdep warning due to seqcount_mutex_init() with wrong address Su Yue
2021-01-21 17:07 ` David Sterba
2021-01-22  4:53   ` Su Yue
2021-01-25 16:53     ` David Sterba
2021-01-26  7:03       ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210126070311.wusdu3sfi6ywdrzb@offworld \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=erhard_f@mailbox.org \
    --cc=l@damenly.su \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox