From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix the false data csum mismatch error caused
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:44:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210301084422.103716-1-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
[BUG]
When running fstresss, we can hit strange data csum mismatch where the
on-disk data is in fact correct (passes both scrub and btrfs check
--check-data-csum).
With some extra debug info added, we have the following traces:
510482us : btrfs_do_readpage: root=5 ino=284 offset=393216, submit force=0 pgoff=0 iosize=8192
510494us : btrfs_do_readpage: root=5 ino=284 offset=401408, submit force=0 pgoff=8192 iosize=4096
510498us : btrfs_submit_data_bio: root=5 ino=284 bio first bvec=393216 len=8192
510591us : btrfs_do_readpage: root=5 ino=284 offset=405504, submit force=0 pgoff=12288 iosize=36864
510594us : btrfs_submit_data_bio: root=5 ino=284 bio first bvec=401408 len=4096
510863us : btrfs_submit_data_bio: root=5 ino=284 bio first bvec=405504 len=36864
510933us : btrfs_verify_data_csum: root=5 ino=284 offset=393216 len=8192
510967us : btrfs_do_readpage: root=5 ino=284 offset=442368, skip beyond isize pgoff=49152 iosize=16384
511047us : btrfs_verify_data_csum: root=5 ino=284 offset=401408 len=4096
511163us : btrfs_verify_data_csum: root=5 ino=284 offset=405504 len=36864
511290us : check_data_csum: !!! root=5 ino=284 offset=438272 pg_off=45056 !!!
517387us : end_bio_extent_readpage: root=5 ino=284 before pending_read_bios=0
[CAUSE]
Normally we expect all submitted bio read to only touch the range we
specified, and under subpage context, it means we should only touch the
range spcified in each bvec.
But in data read path, inside end_bio_extent_readpage(), we have page
zeroing which only takes regular page size into consideration.
This means for subpage if we have an inode whose content looks like below:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|///////| |///////| |
|//| = data needs to be read from disk
| | = hole
And i_size is 64K initially.
Then the following race can happen:
T1 | T2
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
btrfs_do_readpage() |
|- isize = 64K; |
| At this time, the isize is |
| 64K |
| |
|- submit_extent_page() |
| submit previous assembled bio|
| assemble bio for [0, 16K) |
| |
|- submit_extent_page() |
submit read bio for [0, 16K) |
assemble read bio for |
[32K, 48K) |
|
| btrfs_setsize()
| |- i_size_write(, 16K);
| Now i_size is only 16K
end_io() for [0K, 16K) |
|- end_bio_extent_readpage() |
|- btrfs_verify_data_csum() |
| No csum error |
|- i_size = 16K; |
|- zero_user_segment(16K, |
PAGE_SIZE); |
!!! We zeroed range |
!!! [32K, 48K) |
| end_io for [32K, 48K)
| |- end_bio_extent_readpage()
| |- btrfs_verify_data_csum()
| ! CSUM MISMATCH !
| ! As the range is zeroed now !
[FIX]
To fix the problem, make end_bio_extent_readpage() to only zero the
range of bvec.
Thankfully the bug only affects subpage read-write support, as for full
read-only mount we can't change i_size thus won't hit the race
condition.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 424fc9ae99bc..8479ea84b6d9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3041,12 +3041,23 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio)
if (likely(uptodate)) {
loff_t i_size = i_size_read(inode);
pgoff_t end_index = i_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- unsigned off;
- /* Zero out the end if this page straddles i_size */
- off = offset_in_page(i_size);
- if (page->index == end_index && off)
- zero_user_segment(page, off, PAGE_SIZE);
+ /*
+ * Zero out the remaining part if this range straddles
+ * i_size.
+ *
+ * Here we should only zero the range inside the
+ * bvec, not touch anything else.
+ *
+ * NOTE: i_size is exclusive while end is inclusive.
+ */
+ if (page->index == end_index && i_size <= end) {
+ u32 zero_start = max(offset_in_page(i_size),
+ offset_in_page(end));
+
+ zero_user_segment(page, zero_start,
+ offset_in_page(end) + 1);
+ }
}
ASSERT(bio_offset + len > bio_offset);
bio_offset += len;
--
2.30.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-01 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-01 8:44 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-03-01 20:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix the false data csum mismatch error caused David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210301084422.103716-1-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).