From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: introduce submit_eb_subpage() to submit a subpage metadata page
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 08:36:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210406003603.64381-5-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210406003603.64381-1-wqu@suse.com>
The new function, submit_eb_subpage(), will submit all the dirty extent
buffers in the page.
The major difference between submit_eb_page() and submit_eb_subpage()
is:
- How to grab extent buffer
Now we use find_extent_buffer_nospinlock() other than using
page::private.
All other different handling is already done in functions like
lock_extent_buffer_for_io() and write_one_eb().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index db40bc701a03..12321c06e212 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4323,6 +4323,98 @@ static noinline_for_stack int write_one_eb(struct extent_buffer *eb,
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * Submit one subpage btree page.
+ *
+ * The main difference between submit_eb_page() is:
+ * - Page locking
+ * For subpage, we don't rely on page locking at all.
+ *
+ * - Flush write bio
+ * We only flush bio if we may be unable to fit current extent buffers into
+ * current bio.
+ *
+ * Return >=0 for the number of submitted extent buffers.
+ * Return <0 for fatal error.
+ */
+static int submit_eb_subpage(struct page *page,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc,
+ struct extent_page_data *epd)
+{
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(page->mapping->host->i_sb);
+ int submitted = 0;
+ u64 page_start = page_offset(page);
+ int bit_start = 0;
+ int nbits = BTRFS_SUBPAGE_BITMAP_SIZE;
+ int sectors_per_node = fs_info->nodesize >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Lock and write each dirty extent buffers in the range */
+ while (bit_start < nbits) {
+ struct btrfs_subpage *subpage = (struct btrfs_subpage *)page->private;
+ struct extent_buffer *eb;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ u64 start;
+
+ /*
+ * Take private lock to ensure the subpage won't be detached
+ * halfway.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
+ if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
+ spin_unlock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
+ break;
+ }
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&subpage->lock, flags);
+ if (!((1 << bit_start) & subpage->dirty_bitmap)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&subpage->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
+ bit_start++;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ start = page_start + bit_start * fs_info->sectorsize;
+ bit_start += sectors_per_node;
+
+ /*
+ * Here we just want to grab the eb without touching extra
+ * spin locks. So here we call find_extent_buffer_nospinlock().
+ */
+ eb = find_extent_buffer_nospinlock(fs_info, start);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&subpage->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&page->mapping->private_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * The eb has already reached 0 refs thus find_extent_buffer()
+ * doesn't return it. We don't need to write back such eb
+ * anyway.
+ */
+ if (!eb)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = lock_extent_buffer_for_io(eb, epd);
+ if (ret == 0) {
+ free_extent_buffer(eb);
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ free_extent_buffer(eb);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ ret = write_one_eb(eb, wbc, epd);
+ free_extent_buffer(eb);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ submitted++;
+ }
+ return submitted;
+
+cleanup:
+ /* We hit error, end bio for the submitted extent buffers */
+ end_write_bio(epd, ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* Submit all page(s) of one extent buffer.
*
@@ -4355,6 +4447,9 @@ static int submit_eb_page(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc,
if (!PagePrivate(page))
return 0;
+ if (btrfs_sb(page->mapping->host->i_sb)->sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE)
+ return submit_eb_subpage(page, wbc, epd);
+
spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock);
if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-06 0:35 [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: the missing 4 patches to implement metadata write path Qu Wenruo
2021-04-06 0:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: introduce end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage() function Qu Wenruo
2021-04-06 0:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: introduce write_one_subpage_eb() function Qu Wenruo
2021-04-06 0:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: make lock_extent_buffer_for_io() to be subpage compatible Qu Wenruo
2021-04-06 0:36 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-04-23 11:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: the missing 4 patches to implement metadata write path David Sterba
2021-04-23 11:36 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-04-23 20:31 ` David Sterba
2021-04-23 22:34 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210406003603.64381-5-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).