* [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: add misc test for enqueue parameter
@ 2021-04-14 7:49 An Long
2021-04-16 17:38 ` Boris Burkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: An Long @ 2021-04-14 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: An Long
The exclusive ops will not start if there's one already running. The
enqueue parameter allows operations to be queued.
Signed-off-by: An Long <lan@suse.com>
---
.../misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
diff --git a/tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh b/tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..4be7d466
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# Check if --enqueue can enqueueing of the operations correctly
+
+source "$TEST_TOP/common"
+
+check_prereq mkfs.btrfs
+check_prereq btrfs
+check_global_prereq fallocate
+
+setup_loopdevs 3
+prepare_loopdevs
+dev1=${loopdevs[1]}
+dev2=${loopdevs[2]}
+dev3=${loopdevs[3]}
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$dev1"
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$dev2"
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$dev3"
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER mount "$dev1" "$TEST_MNT"
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" device add -f "$dev2" "$TEST_MNT"
+
+test_run_commands() {
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" balance start --enqueue --full-balance "$TEST_MNT" &
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" filesystem resize --enqueue -100M "$TEST_MNT" &
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" device add --enqueue -f "$dev3" "$TEST_MNT" &
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" device delete --enqueue "$dev2" "$TEST_MNT" &
+}
+
+get_fs_uuid() {
+ run_check_stdout "$TOP/btrfs" inspect-internal dump-super "$1" | \
+ grep '^fsid' | awk '{print $2}'
+}
+
+fsid=$(get_fs_uuid "$dev1")
+if ! [ -f "/sys/fs/btrfs/$fsid/exclusive_operation" ]; then
+ run_check_umount_test_dev "$TEST_MNT"
+ cleanup_loopdevs
+ _not_run "kernel does not support exclusive_operation"
+ exit
+fi
+
+# Generate 1G data, for enough balance time for exclusive_operation
+for i in $(seq 1 5); do
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER fallocate -l 200M "$TEST_MNT/file$i"
+done
+
+# Do btrfs balance in background, then try commands with enqueue parameter
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" balance start --full-balance "$TEST_MNT" &
+test_run_commands
+wait
+
+run_check_umount_test_dev "$TEST_MNT"
+cleanup_loopdevs
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: add misc test for enqueue parameter
2021-04-14 7:49 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: add misc test for enqueue parameter An Long
@ 2021-04-16 17:38 ` Boris Burkov
2021-04-18 14:34 ` Long An
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Boris Burkov @ 2021-04-16 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: An Long; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:49:06PM +0800, An Long wrote:
> The exclusive ops will not start if there's one already running. The
> enqueue parameter allows operations to be queued.
>
> Signed-off-by: An Long <lan@suse.com>
> ---
> .../misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
>
> diff --git a/tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh b/tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..4be7d466
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# Check if --enqueue can enqueueing of the operations correctly
> +
> +source "$TEST_TOP/common"
> +
> +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs
> +check_prereq btrfs
> +check_global_prereq fallocate
> +
> +setup_loopdevs 3
> +prepare_loopdevs
> +dev1=${loopdevs[1]}
> +dev2=${loopdevs[2]}
> +dev3=${loopdevs[3]}
> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$dev1"
> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$dev2"
> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$dev3"
> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER mount "$dev1" "$TEST_MNT"
> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" device add -f "$dev2" "$TEST_MNT"
> +
> +test_run_commands() {
> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" balance start --enqueue --full-balance "$TEST_MNT" &
> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" filesystem resize --enqueue -100M "$TEST_MNT" &
> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" device add --enqueue -f "$dev3" "$TEST_MNT" &
> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" device delete --enqueue "$dev2" "$TEST_MNT" &
> +}
> +
> +get_fs_uuid() {
> + run_check_stdout "$TOP/btrfs" inspect-internal dump-super "$1" | \
> + grep '^fsid' | awk '{print $2}'
> +}
> +
> +fsid=$(get_fs_uuid "$dev1")
> +if ! [ -f "/sys/fs/btrfs/$fsid/exclusive_operation" ]; then
> + run_check_umount_test_dev "$TEST_MNT"
> + cleanup_loopdevs
> + _not_run "kernel does not support exclusive_operation"
> + exit
> +fi
> +
> +# Generate 1G data, for enough balance time for exclusive_operation
> +for i in $(seq 1 5); do
> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER fallocate -l 200M "$TEST_MNT/file$i"
> +done
> +
> +# Do btrfs balance in background, then try commands with enqueue parameter
> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" balance start --full-balance "$TEST_MNT" &
> +test_run_commands
> +wait
> +
> +run_check_umount_test_dev "$TEST_MNT"
> +cleanup_loopdevs
> --
> 2.26.2
>
I applied this patch to progs v5.11.1 and ran it on a vm running a
kernel built from e5ff2239e143 (kdave/misc-next rebased today) and each
of the enqueued commands fails without any useful diagnostic
information, nor anything interesting in dmesg as far as I can tell.
e.g.:
"failed: /home/vmuser/btrfs-progs/btrfs filesystem resize --enqueue
-100M /home/vmuser/btrfs-progs/tests/mnt"
I am able to pass other misc tests on this setup.
Is there anything else I need to do to be able to run this test?
Thanks,
Boris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: add misc test for enqueue parameter
2021-04-16 17:38 ` Boris Burkov
@ 2021-04-18 14:34 ` Long An
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Long An @ 2021-04-18 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: boris@bur.io; +Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Fail is the correct result for now. It should pass with patch "btrfs-
progs: Correct check_running_fs_exclop() return value"
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-btrfs/patch/20210409155644.qkk6puelfjvtjwqs@fiona/
Thanks,
An Long
On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 10:38 -0700, Boris Burkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:49:06PM +0800, An Long wrote:
> > The exclusive ops will not start if there's one already running.
> > The
> > enqueue parameter allows operations to be queued.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: An Long <lan@suse.com>
> > ---
> > .../misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh | 52
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100755 tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
> > b/tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..4be7d466
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/misc-tests/048-enqueue-parameter/test.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> > +#!/bin/bash
> > +# Check if --enqueue can enqueueing of the operations correctly
> > +
> > +source "$TEST_TOP/common"
> > +
> > +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs
> > +check_prereq btrfs
> > +check_global_prereq fallocate
> > +
> > +setup_loopdevs 3
> > +prepare_loopdevs
> > +dev1=${loopdevs[1]}
> > +dev2=${loopdevs[2]}
> > +dev3=${loopdevs[3]}
> > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$dev1"
> > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$dev2"
> > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$dev3"
> > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER mount "$dev1" "$TEST_MNT"
> > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" device add -f "$dev2"
> > "$TEST_MNT"
> > +
> > +test_run_commands() {
> > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" balance start --
> > enqueue --full-balance "$TEST_MNT" &
> > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" filesystem resize --
> > enqueue -100M "$TEST_MNT" &
> > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" device add --enqueue
> > -f "$dev3" "$TEST_MNT" &
> > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" device delete --
> > enqueue "$dev2" "$TEST_MNT" &
> > +}
> > +
> > +get_fs_uuid() {
> > + run_check_stdout "$TOP/btrfs" inspect-internal dump-super
> > "$1" | \
> > + grep '^fsid' | awk '{print $2}'
> > +}
> > +
> > +fsid=$(get_fs_uuid "$dev1")
> > +if ! [ -f "/sys/fs/btrfs/$fsid/exclusive_operation" ]; then
> > + run_check_umount_test_dev "$TEST_MNT"
> > + cleanup_loopdevs
> > + _not_run "kernel does not support exclusive_operation"
> > + exit
> > +fi
> > +
> > +# Generate 1G data, for enough balance time for
> > exclusive_operation
> > +for i in $(seq 1 5); do
> > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER fallocate -l 200M
> > "$TEST_MNT/file$i"
> > +done
> > +
> > +# Do btrfs balance in background, then try commands with enqueue
> > parameter
> > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/btrfs" balance start --full-balance
> > "$TEST_MNT" &
> > +test_run_commands
> > +wait
> > +
> > +run_check_umount_test_dev "$TEST_MNT"
> > +cleanup_loopdevs
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
>
> I applied this patch to progs v5.11.1 and ran it on a vm running a
> kernel built from e5ff2239e143 (kdave/misc-next rebased today) and
> each
> of the enqueued commands fails without any useful diagnostic
> information, nor anything interesting in dmesg as far as I can tell.
> e.g.:
> "failed: /home/vmuser/btrfs-progs/btrfs filesystem resize --enqueue
> -100M /home/vmuser/btrfs-progs/tests/mnt"
>
> I am able to pass other misc tests on this setup.
>
> Is there anything else I need to do to be able to run this test?
>
> Thanks,
> Boris
>
--
An Long <lan@suse.com>
SUSE QE LSG, QE Integration 2, Beijing
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-18 14:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-14 7:49 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: add misc test for enqueue parameter An Long
2021-04-16 17:38 ` Boris Burkov
2021-04-18 14:34 ` Long An
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).