linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/30] btrfs: refactor the page status update into process_one_page()
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 16:50:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210531085106.259490-3-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531085106.259490-1-wqu@suse.com>

In __process_pages_contig() we update page status according to page_ops.

That update process is a bunch of if () {} branches, which lies inside
two loops, this makes it pretty hard to expand for later subpage
operations.

So this patch will extract this operations into its own function,
process_one_pages().

Also since we're refactoring __process_pages_contig(), also move the new
helper and __process_pages_contig() before the first caller of them, to
remove the forward declaration.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 206 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 95d61e03f33f..201e68d858ea 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -1808,10 +1808,118 @@ bool btrfs_find_delalloc_range(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 *start,
 	return found;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Process one page for __process_pages_contig().
+ *
+ * Return >0 if we hit @page == @locked_page.
+ * Return 0 if we updated the page status.
+ * Return -EGAIN if the we need to try again.
+ * (For PAGE_LOCK case but got dirty page or page not belong to mapping)
+ */
+static int process_one_page(struct address_space *mapping,
+			    struct page *page, struct page *locked_page,
+			    unsigned long page_ops)
+{
+	if (page_ops & PAGE_SET_ORDERED)
+		SetPageOrdered(page);
+
+	if (page == locked_page)
+		return 1;
+
+	if (page_ops & PAGE_SET_ERROR)
+		SetPageError(page);
+	if (page_ops & PAGE_START_WRITEBACK) {
+		clear_page_dirty_for_io(page);
+		set_page_writeback(page);
+	}
+	if (page_ops & PAGE_END_WRITEBACK)
+		end_page_writeback(page);
+	if (page_ops & PAGE_LOCK) {
+		lock_page(page);
+		if (!PageDirty(page) || page->mapping != mapping) {
+			unlock_page(page);
+			return -EAGAIN;
+		}
+	}
+	if (page_ops & PAGE_UNLOCK)
+		unlock_page(page);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __process_pages_contig(struct address_space *mapping,
 				  struct page *locked_page,
 				  u64 start, u64 end, unsigned long page_ops,
-				  u64 *processed_end);
+				  u64 *processed_end)
+{
+	pgoff_t start_index = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	pgoff_t end_index = end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	pgoff_t index = start_index;
+	unsigned long nr_pages = end_index - start_index + 1;
+	unsigned long pages_processed = 0;
+	struct page *pages[16];
+	int err = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	if (page_ops & PAGE_LOCK) {
+		ASSERT(page_ops == PAGE_LOCK);
+		ASSERT(processed_end && *processed_end == start);
+	}
+
+	if ((page_ops & PAGE_SET_ERROR) && nr_pages > 0)
+		mapping_set_error(mapping, -EIO);
+
+	while (nr_pages > 0) {
+		int found_pages;
+
+		found_pages = find_get_pages_contig(mapping, index,
+				     min_t(unsigned long,
+				     nr_pages, ARRAY_SIZE(pages)), pages);
+		if (found_pages == 0) {
+			/*
+			 * Only if we're going to lock these pages,
+			 * can we find nothing at @index.
+			 */
+			ASSERT(page_ops & PAGE_LOCK);
+			err = -EAGAIN;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		for (i = 0; i < found_pages; i++) {
+			int process_ret;
+
+			process_ret = process_one_page(mapping, pages[i],
+					locked_page, page_ops);
+			if (process_ret < 0) {
+				for (; i < found_pages; i++)
+					put_page(pages[i]);
+				err = -EAGAIN;
+				goto out;
+			}
+			put_page(pages[i]);
+			pages_processed++;
+		}
+		nr_pages -= found_pages;
+		index += found_pages;
+		cond_resched();
+	}
+out:
+	if (err && processed_end) {
+		/*
+		 * Update @processed_end. I know this is awful since it has
+		 * two different return value patterns (inclusive vs exclusive).
+		 *
+		 * But the exclusive pattern is necessary if @start is 0, or we
+		 * underflow and check against processed_end won't work as
+		 * expected.
+		 */
+		if (pages_processed)
+			*processed_end = min(end,
+			((u64)(start_index + pages_processed) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
+		else
+			*processed_end = start;
+	}
+	return err;
+}
 
 static noinline void __unlock_for_delalloc(struct inode *inode,
 					   struct page *locked_page,
@@ -1939,102 +2047,6 @@ noinline_for_stack bool find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode,
 	return found;
 }
 
-static int __process_pages_contig(struct address_space *mapping,
-				  struct page *locked_page,
-				  u64 start, u64 end, unsigned long page_ops,
-				  u64 *processed_end)
-{
-	pgoff_t start_index = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-	pgoff_t end_index = end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-	pgoff_t index = start_index;
-	unsigned long nr_pages = end_index - start_index + 1;
-	unsigned long pages_processed = 0;
-	struct page *pages[16];
-	unsigned ret;
-	int err = 0;
-	int i;
-
-	if (page_ops & PAGE_LOCK) {
-		ASSERT(page_ops == PAGE_LOCK);
-		ASSERT(processed_end && *processed_end == start);
-	}
-
-	if ((page_ops & PAGE_SET_ERROR) && nr_pages > 0)
-		mapping_set_error(mapping, -EIO);
-
-	while (nr_pages > 0) {
-		int found_pages;
-
-		found_pages = find_get_pages_contig(mapping, index,
-				     min_t(unsigned long,
-				     nr_pages, ARRAY_SIZE(pages)), pages);
-		if (found_pages == 0) {
-			/*
-			 * Only if we're going to lock these pages,
-			 * can we find nothing at @index.
-			 */
-			ASSERT(page_ops & PAGE_LOCK);
-			err = -EAGAIN;
-			goto out;
-		}
-
-		for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
-			if (page_ops & PAGE_SET_ORDERED)
-				SetPageOrdered(pages[i]);
-
-			if (locked_page && pages[i] == locked_page) {
-				put_page(pages[i]);
-				pages_processed++;
-				continue;
-			}
-			if (page_ops & PAGE_START_WRITEBACK) {
-				clear_page_dirty_for_io(pages[i]);
-				set_page_writeback(pages[i]);
-			}
-			if (page_ops & PAGE_SET_ERROR)
-				SetPageError(pages[i]);
-			if (page_ops & PAGE_END_WRITEBACK)
-				end_page_writeback(pages[i]);
-			if (page_ops & PAGE_UNLOCK)
-				unlock_page(pages[i]);
-			if (page_ops & PAGE_LOCK) {
-				lock_page(pages[i]);
-				if (!PageDirty(pages[i]) ||
-				    pages[i]->mapping != mapping) {
-					unlock_page(pages[i]);
-					for (; i < ret; i++)
-						put_page(pages[i]);
-					err = -EAGAIN;
-					goto out;
-				}
-			}
-			put_page(pages[i]);
-			pages_processed++;
-		}
-		nr_pages -= found_pages;
-		index += found_pages;
-		cond_resched();
-	}
-out:
-	if (err && processed_end) {
-		/*
-		 * Update @processed_end. I know this is awful since it has
-		 * two different return value patterns (inclusive vs exclusive).
-		 *
-		 * But the exclusive pattern is necessary if @start is 0, or we
-		 * underflow and check against processed_end won't work as
-		 * expected.
-		 */
-		if (pages_processed)
-			*processed_end = min(end,
-			((u64)(start_index + pages_processed) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
-		else
-			*processed_end = start;
-
-	}
-	return err;
-}
-
 void extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end,
 				  struct page *locked_page,
 				  u32 clear_bits, unsigned long page_ops)
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-31  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-31  8:50 [PATCH v4 00/30] btrfs: add data write support for subpage Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 01/30] btrfs: pass bytenr directly to __process_pages_contig() Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 03/30] btrfs: provide btrfs_page_clamp_*() helpers Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 04/30] btrfs: only require sector size alignment for end_bio_extent_writepage() Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 05/30] btrfs: make btrfs_dirty_pages() to be subpage compatible Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 06/30] btrfs: make __process_pages_contig() to handle subpage dirty/error/writeback status Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 07/30] btrfs: make end_bio_extent_writepage() to be subpage compatible Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 08/30] btrfs: make process_one_page() to handle subpage locking Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 09/30] btrfs: introduce helpers for subpage ordered status Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 10/30] btrfs: make page Ordered bit to be subpage compatible Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 11/30] btrfs: update locked page dirty/writeback/error bits in __process_pages_contig Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 12/30] btrfs: prevent extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() to unlock page not locked by __process_pages_contig() Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 13/30] btrfs: make btrfs_set_range_writeback() subpage compatible Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 14/30] btrfs: make __extent_writepage_io() only submit dirty range for subpage Qu Wenruo
2021-06-04 14:58   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 15/30] btrfs: make btrfs_truncate_block() to be subpage compatible Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 16/30] btrfs: make btrfs_page_mkwrite() " Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 17/30] btrfs: reflink: make copy_inline_to_page() " Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 18/30] btrfs: fix the filemap_range_has_page() call in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 19/30] btrfs: don't clear page extent mapped if we're not invalidating the full page Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 20/30] btrfs: extract relocation page read and dirty part into its own function Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 21/30] btrfs: make relocate_one_page() to handle subpage case Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 22/30] btrfs: fix wild subpage writeback which does not have ordered extent Qu Wenruo
2021-06-02 16:25   ` David Sterba
2021-05-31  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 23/30] btrfs: disable inline extent creation for subpage Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:51 ` [PATCH v4 24/30] btrfs: allow submit_extent_page() to do bio split " Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:51 ` [PATCH v4 25/30] btrfs: reject raid5/6 fs " Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:51 ` [PATCH v4 26/30] btrfs: fix a crash caused by race between prepare_pages() and btrfs_releasepage() Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:51 ` [PATCH v4 27/30] btrfs: fix a use-after-free bug in writeback subpage helper Qu Wenruo
2021-06-02 16:48   ` David Sterba
2021-05-31  8:51 ` [PATCH v4 28/30] btrfs: fix a subpage false alert for relocating partial preallocated data extents Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31  8:51 ` [PATCH v4 29/30] btrfs: fix a subpage relocation data corruption Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31 10:26   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-06-01  1:07     ` Qu Wenruo
2021-06-02 17:10       ` David Sterba
2021-05-31  8:51 ` [PATCH v4 30/30] btrfs: allow read-write for 4K sectorsize on 64K page size systems Qu Wenruo
2021-06-02 17:37   ` David Sterba
2021-05-31  9:47 ` [PATCH v4 00/30] btrfs: add data write support for subpage Neal Gompa
2021-05-31  9:50   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31 12:17     ` Neal Gompa
2021-05-31 13:08       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-31 14:09 ` David Sterba
2021-06-01  0:21   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-06-02  2:22 ` riteshh
2021-06-02  2:24   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-06-02  2:27     ` riteshh
2021-06-02 17:39   ` David Sterba
2021-06-02 17:57 ` David Sterba
2021-06-03  6:20   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-06-08  8:23 ` Anand Jain
2021-06-08  9:02   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-06-08  9:45     ` Anand Jain
2021-06-08  9:50       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-06-08 11:11         ` Anand Jain
2021-06-17 20:40           ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210531085106.259490-3-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).