From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6CAC4338F for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D24560EB4 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231317AbhGWQrA (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:47:00 -0400 Received: from rin.romanrm.net ([51.158.148.128]:40722 "EHLO rin.romanrm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231171AbhGWQq7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:46:59 -0400 Received: from natsu (natsu2.home.romanrm.net [IPv6:fd39::e99e:8f1b:cfc9:ccb8]) by rin.romanrm.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DF96C15F; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 22:27:30 +0500 From: Roman Mamedov To: David Sterba Cc: Qu Wenruo , David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: allow degenerate raid0/raid10 Message-ID: <20210723222730.1d23f9b4@natsu> In-Reply-To: <20210723140843.GE19710@twin.jikos.cz> References: <20210722192955.18709-1-dsterba@suse.com> <20210723140843.GE19710@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 16:08:43 +0200 David Sterba wrote: > > Can we slightly enhance the output? > > RAID0/1 really looks like a new profile now, even the "1" really means > > the number of device. > > Do you have a concrete suggestion? This format was inspired by a > discussion and suggested by users so I guess this is what people expect > and I find it clear. It's also documented in manual page so if you think > it's not clear or missing some important information, please let me > know. It really reads like another RAID level, easily confused with RAID10. Or that it would flip between RAID0 and RAID1 depending on something. Maybe something like RAID0d1? -- With respect, Roman