From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED37C432BE for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D65660F56 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239484AbhHaPmB (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 11:42:01 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:42322 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232421AbhHaPmB (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 11:42:01 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A62420195; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:41:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1630424465; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q6CJdmoWP/OeBDKoceutwP0hjxdV/4HZQNQZSZKMsdk=; b=j7/uw5xFKRsEtFw5rMF/QY7vw47wGO2DVzklyQUagPFt7GlN3ysK6oT9OIMV+NwqJ3dmoi IbvsE6GSqHkusp801sk74o3tGz1COXsrJMcDDDufBerqS1iNkEy/Dbfzz8G9pilyfHfydf Y8zjrSC/3jN2p9waCOOL3hq/qZEjkMU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1630424465; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q6CJdmoWP/OeBDKoceutwP0hjxdV/4HZQNQZSZKMsdk=; b=ZTCajHAvOQI5ovSuxXpTLYliLYYwIcKb+iVK+Bx6PR3fEfoRFCyVu2ViN+ZYAhtZng03zI 5unWnep9wqQHXEDQ== Received: from ds.suse.cz (ds.suse.cz [10.100.12.205]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1250CA3B93; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id E492DDA8C1; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:41:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:41:04 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Su Yue Cc: Anand Jain , dsterba@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] btrf_show_devname related fixes Message-ID: <20210831154104.GL3379@suse.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Su Yue , Anand Jain , dsterba@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <34118c32-0d7f-426b-7596-4372315599ea@oracle.com> <1r69r830.fsf@damenly.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1r69r830.fsf@damenly.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:28:24PM +0800, Su Yue wrote: > > On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 06:41, Anand Jain > wrote: > > > Ping. > > > In the past week, I spent some time on testing this patchset and > the patch 'btrfs: fix lockdep warning while mounting sprout fs'. > > Same as you, I wonder if there is any race condition. Just wrote > some scripts including device removal, replace and sprout while > busy looping showing mount info. It runned well and passed > xfstests > in my two VMs. I'm not a pundit in btrfs device field so I can't > give my > RBs even these patches looks almost okay to me. So this could be a Tested-by if you want.