From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 082/109] btrfs: subpage: fix race between prepare_pages() and btrfs_releasepage()
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 07:54:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210909115507.147917-82-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210909115507.147917-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
[ Upstream commit e0467866198f7f536806f39e5d0d91ae8018de08 ]
[BUG]
When running generic/095, there is a high chance to crash with subpage
data RW support:
assertion failed: PagePrivate(page) && page->private
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3403!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
CPU: 1 PID: 3567 Comm: fio Tainted: 5.12.0-rc7-custom+ #17
Hardware name: Khadas VIM3 (DT)
Call trace:
assertfail.constprop.0+0x28/0x2c [btrfs]
btrfs_subpage_assert+0x80/0xa0 [btrfs]
btrfs_subpage_set_uptodate+0x34/0xec [btrfs]
btrfs_page_clamp_set_uptodate+0x74/0xa4 [btrfs]
btrfs_dirty_pages+0x160/0x270 [btrfs]
btrfs_buffered_write+0x444/0x630 [btrfs]
btrfs_direct_write+0x1cc/0x2d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_file_write_iter+0xc0/0x160 [btrfs]
new_sync_write+0xe8/0x180
vfs_write+0x1b4/0x210
ksys_pwrite64+0x7c/0xc0
__arm64_sys_pwrite64+0x24/0x30
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x140
do_el0_svc+0x28/0x90
el0_svc+0x2c/0x54
el0_sync_handler+0x1a8/0x1ac
el0_sync+0x170/0x180
Code: f0000160 913be042 913c4000 955444bc (d4210000)
---[ end trace 3fdd39f4cccedd68 ]---
[CAUSE]
Although prepare_pages() calls find_or_create_page(), which returns the
page locked, but in later prepare_uptodate_page() calls, we may call
btrfs_readpage() which will unlock the page before it returns.
This leaves a window where btrfs_releasepage() can sneak in and release
the page, clearing page->private and causing above ASSERT().
[FIX]
In prepare_uptodate_page(), we should not only check page->mapping, but
also PagePrivate() to ensure we are still holding the correct page which
has proper fs context setup.
Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 1279359ed172..0af696ba5051 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1407,7 +1407,18 @@ static int prepare_uptodate_page(struct inode *inode,
unlock_page(page);
return -EIO;
}
- if (page->mapping != inode->i_mapping) {
+
+ /*
+ * Since btrfs_readpage() will unlock the page before it
+ * returns, there is a window where btrfs_releasepage() can
+ * be called to release the page.
+ * Here we check both inode mapping and PagePrivate() to
+ * make sure the page was not released.
+ *
+ * The private flag check is essential for subpage as we need
+ * to store extra bitmap using page->private.
+ */
+ if (page->mapping != inode->i_mapping || !PagePrivate(page)) {
unlock_page(page);
return -EAGAIN;
}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-09 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210909115507.147917-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-09 11:54 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 081/109] btrfs: subpage: check if there are compressed extents inside one page Sasha Levin
2021-09-09 13:00 ` David Sterba
2021-09-09 11:54 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2021-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 082/109] btrfs: subpage: fix race between prepare_pages() and btrfs_releasepage() David Sterba
2021-09-09 11:54 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 083/109] btrfs: tree-log: check btrfs_lookup_data_extent return value Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210909115507.147917-82-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox