* [PATCH 1/1] fs: btrfs: avoid superfluous messages
@ 2021-09-16 8:02 Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-09-16 12:01 ` Marek Behún
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heinrich Schuchardt @ 2021-09-16 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marek Behun, Qu Wenruo; +Cc: linux-btrfs, u-boot, Heinrich Schuchardt
Output like the following is quite irritating:
=> bootefi hello
Scanning disk mmc2.blk...
No valid Btrfs found
Bad magic number for SquashFS image.
** Unrecognized filesystem type **
Scanning disk mmc1.blk...
No valid Btrfs found
Bad magic number for SquashFS image.
** Unrecognized filesystem type **
Scanning disk mmc0.blk...
No valid Btrfs found
Bad magic number for SquashFS image.
** Unrecognized filesystem type **
It is expected that most partitions don't contain a Btrfs. This is only
worth a debug message.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 12f9579fcf..7a4fb0d259 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
#include <common.h>
#include <fs_internal.h>
+#include <log.h>
#include <uuid.h>
#include <memalign.h>
#include "kernel-shared/btrfs_tree.h"
@@ -918,7 +919,7 @@ static int btrfs_scan_fs_devices(struct blk_desc *desc,
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(desc, part, fs_devices, &total_devs);
if (ret) {
- fprintf(stderr, "No valid Btrfs found\n");
+ log_debug("No valid Btrfs found\n");
return ret;
}
return 0;
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs: btrfs: avoid superfluous messages
2021-09-16 8:02 [PATCH 1/1] fs: btrfs: avoid superfluous messages Heinrich Schuchardt
@ 2021-09-16 12:01 ` Marek Behún
2021-09-16 13:34 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marek Behún @ 2021-09-16 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heinrich Schuchardt, Simon Glass, Tom Rini; +Cc: Qu Wenruo, linux-btrfs, u-boot
On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:02:45 +0200
Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com> wrote:
Heinrich, Simon already sent patch
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20210818214022.4.I3eb71025472bbb050bcf9a0a192dde1b6c07fa7f@changeid/
Tom, could you apply Simon's version?
Marek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs: btrfs: avoid superfluous messages
2021-09-16 12:01 ` Marek Behún
@ 2021-09-16 13:34 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2021-09-16 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marek Behún
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt, Simon Glass, Qu Wenruo, linux-btrfs, u-boot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 464 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 02:01:28PM +0200, Marek Behún wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:02:45 +0200
> Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Heinrich, Simon already sent patch
> https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20210818214022.4.I3eb71025472bbb050bcf9a0a192dde1b6c07fa7f@changeid/
>
> Tom, could you apply Simon's version?
Yes, I should probably do another round of -next patches today and I'll
grab that series.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-16 13:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-16 8:02 [PATCH 1/1] fs: btrfs: avoid superfluous messages Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-09-16 12:01 ` Marek Behún
2021-09-16 13:34 ` Tom Rini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox