From: Sidong Yang <realwakka@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: balance: print warn mesg in old command
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 12:55:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211031125518.GA42183@realwakka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d084bb90-72e5-0d7f-b89d-7334fc45de28@gmx.com>
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 07:28:17PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/10/31 10:21, Sidong Yang wrote:
> > This patch makes old balance command to print warn mesg same as in start
> > command. It makes a function that print warn mesg and commands use that
> > function.
> >
> > Issue: #411
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sidong Yang <realwakka@gmail.com>
Hi, Qu.
Thanks for review!
>
> The patch is indeed solving a problem, so good job.
>
> But I found something weird which may worth some refactor before the fix.
>
> > ---
> > cmds/balance.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/cmds/balance.c b/cmds/balance.c
> > index 7abc69d9..8d8db8a2 100644
> > --- a/cmds/balance.c
> > +++ b/cmds/balance.c
> > @@ -303,6 +303,25 @@ enum {
> > BALANCE_START_NOWARN = 1 << 1
>
> We have such flag for do_balance(), but it only checks START_FILTERS, no
> check for START_NOWARN.
Yes. I've checked do_balance() that it doesn't check START_NOWARN.
>
> So can we handle it better for the warning in do_balance() other than
> cmd_balance_full() or cmd_balance_start()?
Totally agree. It would be better that it prints warning message in do_balance().
Also it's a way to simplify the logic.
>
> And fully utilize the START_NOWARN flags?
I'll send you v2 soon.
Thanks,
Sidong
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
> > };
> >
> > +static void print_start_warn_mesg()
> > +{
> > + int delay = 10;
> > +
> > + printf("WARNING:\n\n");
> > + printf("\tFull balance without filters requested. This operation is very\n");
> > + printf("\tintense and takes potentially very long. It is recommended to\n");
> > + printf("\tuse the balance filters to narrow down the scope of balance.\n");
> > + printf("\tUse 'btrfs balance start --full-balance' option to skip this\n");
> > + printf("\twarning. The operation will start in %d seconds.\n", delay);
> > + printf("\tUse Ctrl-C to stop it.\n");
> > + while (delay) {
> > + printf("%2d", delay--);
> > + fflush(stdout);
> > + sleep(1);
> > + }
> > + printf("\nStarting balance without any filters.\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > static int do_balance(const char *path, struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_args *args,
> > unsigned flags, bool enqueue)
> > {
> > @@ -548,21 +567,7 @@ static int cmd_balance_start(const struct cmd_struct *cmd,
> > }
> >
> > if (!(start_flags & BALANCE_START_FILTERS) && !(start_flags & BALANCE_START_NOWARN)) {
> > - int delay = 10;
> > -
> > - printf("WARNING:\n\n");
> > - printf("\tFull balance without filters requested. This operation is very\n");
> > - printf("\tintense and takes potentially very long. It is recommended to\n");
> > - printf("\tuse the balance filters to narrow down the scope of balance.\n");
> > - printf("\tUse 'btrfs balance start --full-balance' option to skip this\n");
> > - printf("\twarning. The operation will start in %d seconds.\n", delay);
> > - printf("\tUse Ctrl-C to stop it.\n");
> > - while (delay) {
> > - printf("%2d", delay--);
> > - fflush(stdout);
> > - sleep(1);
> > - }
> > - printf("\nStarting balance without any filters.\n");
> > + print_start_warn_mesg();
> > }
> >
> > if (force)
> > @@ -886,6 +891,8 @@ static int cmd_balance(const struct cmd_struct *cmd, int argc, char **argv)
> > memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
> > args.flags |= BTRFS_BALANCE_TYPE_MASK;
> >
> > + print_start_warn_mesg();
> > +
> > /* No enqueueing supported for the obsolete syntax */
> > return do_balance(argv[1], &args, 0, false);
> > }
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-31 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-31 2:21 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: balance: print warn mesg in old command Sidong Yang
2021-10-31 11:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-10-31 12:55 ` Sidong Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211031125518.GA42183@realwakka \
--to=realwakka@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox