From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBC6C433F5 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFFC61215 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232712AbhKELxy (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 07:53:54 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:58646 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231952AbhKELxy (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 07:53:54 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AAB212BC; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:51:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1636113073; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GLnNnciQBxIm9dixRppFJ+O0DJZUtntS5N+qiTHFsOk=; b=QGKUrVmHdbFSvfebjLm7+PDrDmzpoOQtFZFoS59vEbTVIX4uuhIpHnl5pykPRAhrGHapY/ z2FSUQLoQDc/O9bz9g7pOpXvLyq0BtraoJDF0t4ZGzaPNMNKX9yrgQVd9OwYS3fmFwafiW ZCkrR/IZGyWX77Xk1bfLrA/nReXpZvE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1636113073; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GLnNnciQBxIm9dixRppFJ+O0DJZUtntS5N+qiTHFsOk=; b=XmnFOHLvbF63Qn7w8zeOmTQNgGsCVcSCapG2I/0BL4ozfL6aDd9X3CWUMC32fGXnA8mV68 F5z6PhRZ/4GLdcAA== Received: from ds.suse.cz (ds.suse.cz [10.100.12.205]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19802C144; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id CF83CDA735; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 12:50:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 12:50:36 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Wang Yugui Cc: Sidong Yang , linux-btrfs Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: balance: print warn mesg in old command Message-ID: <20211105115036.GH28560@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Wang Yugui , Sidong Yang , linux-btrfs References: <20211031131011.42401-1-realwakka@gmail.com> <20211105160541.ED15.409509F4@e16-tech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211105160541.ED15.409509F4@e16-tech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:05:41PM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote: > Hi, > > This patch broken tests/cli-tests/002-balance-full-no-filters. > > becasue this > printf("WARNING:\n\n"); > printf("\tFull balance without filters requested. This operation is very\n"); > is put after fork() in this patch when '--backgroud'; Right, I ran all the other tests than test-cli. I'll remove the patch from 5.15 queue.