From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE05C433EF for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 19:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A72D6109D for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 19:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237747AbhKHTnh (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:43:37 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:42218 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237583AbhKHTng (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:43:36 -0500 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CE921976; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 19:40:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1636400450; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cAB0U75QvAzJcXdBI8Etmwczx88oAyl77uinvtsVVxI=; b=b3PsBicHeDKMjgazAeWZcTGYhSfP9zCSrVqu6Oq+PuzRJ+TmAshNMDI9THXX9/kIg3KapO VPawdlHlbNQoxCyd1/rcLvIkC7TuDs9ACJh842W4r24a1cEBlCv222F0vRZK9ZN3PE9jh7 IXDfHJk0nbFiBeFjXbYvVOBmBXmerwI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1636400450; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cAB0U75QvAzJcXdBI8Etmwczx88oAyl77uinvtsVVxI=; b=FcaL1DzLnlVmI3sNkomKA4mCBzltvbfQNh5rs621U9vHqge5PKcYd5WkrVofg94HFKPCiN 8zqYu+SC7S//PaAg== Received: from ds.suse.cz (ds.suse.cz [10.100.12.205]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8971A3B84; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 19:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 44DBADA799; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:40:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:40:12 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Omar Sandoval Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: send: two tiny unused parameter cleanups Message-ID: <20211108194012.GM28560@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Omar Sandoval , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 05:00:11PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > From: Omar Sandoval > > I encountered some places where we pass around btrfs_dir_type() > unnecessarily while I was working on fscrypt support. I might need to > stuff a flag in btrfs_dir_type() for fscrypt, so using dir_type in less > places makes it easier to audit that change. Either way, these are > unused parameters so we should just drop them as a cleanup. > > Omar Sandoval (2): > btrfs: send: remove unused found_type parameter to > lookup_dir_item_inode() > btrfs: send: remove unused type parameter to iterate_inode_ref_t Added to misc-next, thanks.