public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: remove the unnecessary path parameter for scrub_raid56_parity()
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:10:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211213131054.102526-2-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213131054.102526-1-wqu@suse.com>

In function scrub_stripe() we allocated two btrfs_path, one @path for
extent tree search and another @ppath for full stripe extent tree search
for RAID56.

This is totally uncessary, as the @ppath usage is completely inside
scrub_raid56_parity(), thus we can move the path allocation into
scrub_raid56_parity() completely.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 15a123e67108..a3bd3dfd5e8b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -2892,7 +2892,6 @@ static void scrub_parity_put(struct scrub_parity *sparity)
 static noinline_for_stack int scrub_raid56_parity(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 						  struct map_lookup *map,
 						  struct btrfs_device *sdev,
-						  struct btrfs_path *path,
 						  u64 logic_start,
 						  u64 logic_end)
 {
@@ -2901,6 +2900,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_raid56_parity(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 	struct btrfs_root *csum_root;
 	struct btrfs_extent_item *extent;
 	struct btrfs_io_context *bioc = NULL;
+	struct btrfs_path *path;
 	u64 flags;
 	int ret;
 	int slot;
@@ -2919,6 +2919,14 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_raid56_parity(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 	int extent_mirror_num;
 	int stop_loop = 0;
 
+	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
+	if (!path) {
+		spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
+		sctx->stat.malloc_errors++;
+		spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
 	ASSERT(map->stripe_len <= U32_MAX);
 	nsectors = map->stripe_len >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
 	bitmap_len = scrub_calc_parity_bitmap_len(nsectors);
@@ -2928,6 +2936,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_raid56_parity(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 		spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
 		sctx->stat.malloc_errors++;
 		spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
+		btrfs_free_path(path);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
@@ -3117,7 +3126,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_raid56_parity(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 	scrub_wr_submit(sctx);
 	mutex_unlock(&sctx->wr_lock);
 
-	btrfs_release_path(path);
+	btrfs_free_path(path);
 	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
 }
 
@@ -3167,7 +3176,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 					   int num, u64 base, u64 length,
 					   struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
 {
-	struct btrfs_path *path, *ppath;
+	struct btrfs_path *path;
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
 	struct btrfs_root *root;
 	struct btrfs_root *csum_root;
@@ -3229,12 +3238,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 	if (!path)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	ppath = btrfs_alloc_path();
-	if (!ppath) {
-		btrfs_free_path(path);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * work on commit root. The related disk blocks are static as
 	 * long as COW is applied. This means, it is save to rewrite
@@ -3243,8 +3246,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 	path->search_commit_root = 1;
 	path->skip_locking = 1;
 
-	ppath->search_commit_root = 1;
-	ppath->skip_locking = 1;
 	/*
 	 * trigger the readahead for extent tree csum tree and wait for
 	 * completion. During readahead, the scrub is officially paused
@@ -3347,7 +3348,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 				stripe_logical += base;
 				stripe_end = stripe_logical + increment;
 				ret = scrub_raid56_parity(sctx, map, scrub_dev,
-							  ppath, stripe_logical,
+							  stripe_logical,
 							  stripe_end);
 				if (ret)
 					goto out;
@@ -3518,7 +3519,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 						stripe_end = stripe_logical +
 								increment;
 						ret = scrub_raid56_parity(sctx,
-							map, scrub_dev, ppath,
+							map, scrub_dev,
 							stripe_logical,
 							stripe_end);
 						if (ret)
@@ -3565,7 +3566,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 
 	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
 	btrfs_free_path(path);
-	btrfs_free_path(ppath);
 
 	if (sctx->is_dev_replace && ret >= 0) {
 		int ret2;
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-13 13:10 [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: use btrfs_path::reada to replace the Qu Wenruo
2021-12-13 13:10 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-12-14 12:44   ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: remove the unnecessary path parameter for scrub_raid56_parity() Qu Wenruo
2021-12-13 13:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: remove reada mechanism Qu Wenruo
2021-12-13 13:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: use btrfs_path::reada for scrub extent tree readahead Qu Wenruo
2021-12-14 12:41 ` [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: use btrfs_path::reada to replace the David Sterba
2021-12-14 12:45   ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211213131054.102526-2-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox