From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: cleanup the argument list of scrub_stripe()
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:59:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211215065942.26683-2-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211215065942.26683-1-wqu@suse.com>
The argument list of btrfs_stripe() has similar problems of
scrub_chunk():
- Duplicated and ambiguous @base argument
Can be fetched from btrfs_block_group::bg.
- Ambiguous argument @length
It's again device extent length
- Ambiguous argument @num
The instinctive guess would be mirror number, but in fact it's stripe
index.
Fix it by:
- Remove @base parameter
- Rename @length to @dev_ext_len
- Rename @num to @stripe_index
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index ffbaf6fbf71c..f20ad60dcc0e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -3173,10 +3173,10 @@ static int sync_write_pointer_for_zoned(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, u64 logical,
}
static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
+ struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
struct map_lookup *map,
struct btrfs_device *scrub_dev,
- int num, u64 base, u64 length,
- struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
+ int stripe_index, u64 dev_ext_len)
{
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
@@ -3184,6 +3184,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
struct btrfs_root *csum_root;
struct btrfs_extent_item *extent;
struct blk_plug plug;
+ const u64 chunk_logical = bg->start;
u64 flags;
int ret;
int slot;
@@ -3211,25 +3212,26 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
int extent_mirror_num;
int stop_loop = 0;
- physical = map->stripes[num].physical;
+ physical = map->stripes[stripe_index].physical;
offset = 0;
- nstripes = div64_u64(length, map->stripe_len);
+ nstripes = div64_u64(dev_ext_len, map->stripe_len);
mirror_num = 1;
increment = map->stripe_len;
if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0) {
- offset = map->stripe_len * num;
+ offset = map->stripe_len * stripe_index;
increment = map->stripe_len * map->num_stripes;
} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) {
int factor = map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes;
- offset = map->stripe_len * (num / map->sub_stripes);
+ offset = map->stripe_len * (stripe_index / map->sub_stripes);
increment = map->stripe_len * factor;
- mirror_num = num % map->sub_stripes + 1;
+ mirror_num = stripe_index % map->sub_stripes + 1;
} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1_MASK) {
- mirror_num = num % map->num_stripes + 1;
+ mirror_num = stripe_index % map->num_stripes + 1;
} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP) {
- mirror_num = num % map->num_stripes + 1;
+ mirror_num = stripe_index % map->num_stripes + 1;
} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
- get_raid56_logic_offset(physical, num, map, &offset, NULL);
+ get_raid56_logic_offset(physical, stripe_index, map, &offset,
+ NULL);
increment = map->stripe_len * nr_data_stripes(map);
}
@@ -3246,12 +3248,12 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
path->skip_locking = 1;
path->reada = READA_FORWARD;
- logical = base + offset;
+ logical = chunk_logical + offset;
physical_end = physical + nstripes * map->stripe_len;
if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
- get_raid56_logic_offset(physical_end, num,
+ get_raid56_logic_offset(physical_end, stripe_index,
map, &logic_end, NULL);
- logic_end += base;
+ logic_end += chunk_logical;
} else {
logic_end = logical + increment * nstripes;
}
@@ -3306,13 +3308,13 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
}
if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
- ret = get_raid56_logic_offset(physical, num, map,
- &logical,
+ ret = get_raid56_logic_offset(physical, stripe_index,
+ map, &logical,
&stripe_logical);
- logical += base;
+ logical += chunk_logical;
if (ret) {
/* it is parity strip */
- stripe_logical += base;
+ stripe_logical += chunk_logical;
stripe_end = stripe_logical + increment;
ret = scrub_raid56_parity(sctx, map, scrub_dev,
stripe_logical,
@@ -3392,13 +3394,13 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
* Continuing would prevent reusing its device extents
* for new block groups for a long time.
*/
- spin_lock(&cache->lock);
- if (cache->removed) {
- spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
+ spin_lock(&bg->lock);
+ if (bg->removed) {
+ spin_unlock(&bg->lock);
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
- spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&bg->lock);
extent = btrfs_item_ptr(l, slot,
struct btrfs_extent_item);
@@ -3477,12 +3479,12 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
loop:
physical += map->stripe_len;
ret = get_raid56_logic_offset(physical,
- num, map, &logical,
- &stripe_logical);
- logical += base;
+ stripe_index, map,
+ &logical, &stripe_logical);
+ logical += chunk_logical;
if (ret && physical < physical_end) {
- stripe_logical += base;
+ stripe_logical += chunk_logical;
stripe_end = stripe_logical +
increment;
ret = scrub_raid56_parity(sctx,
@@ -3516,8 +3518,8 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
physical += map->stripe_len;
spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
if (stop_loop)
- sctx->stat.last_physical = map->stripes[num].physical +
- length;
+ sctx->stat.last_physical = map->stripes[stripe_index].physical +
+ dev_ext_len;
else
sctx->stat.last_physical = physical;
spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
@@ -3537,9 +3539,10 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
if (sctx->is_dev_replace && ret >= 0) {
int ret2;
- ret2 = sync_write_pointer_for_zoned(sctx, base + offset,
- map->stripes[num].physical,
- physical_end);
+ ret2 = sync_write_pointer_for_zoned(sctx,
+ chunk_logical + offset,
+ map->stripes[stripe_index].physical,
+ physical_end);
if (ret2)
ret = ret2;
}
@@ -3585,8 +3588,8 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_chunk(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; ++i) {
if (map->stripes[i].dev->bdev == scrub_dev->bdev &&
map->stripes[i].physical == dev_offset) {
- ret = scrub_stripe(sctx, map, scrub_dev, i,
- bg->start, dev_ext_len, bg);
+ ret = scrub_stripe(sctx, bg, map, scrub_dev, i,
+ dev_ext_len);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-15 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-15 6:59 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: cleanup the argument list of scrub_chunk() Qu Wenruo
2021-12-15 6:59 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-12-15 15:45 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211215065942.26683-2-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox