From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Radoslaw Burny <rburny@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:39:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220211103913.GR23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cgPFLjQyopX04MwG6Leq6DwDJF2q6BxOL_Nw6J2LEZF4g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 09:55:27PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> So you are ok with adding two new tracepoints, even if they are
> similar to what we already have in lockdep/lock_stat, right?
Yeah, I don't think adding tracepoints to the slowpaths of the various
locks should be a problem.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-11 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 18:41 [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1) Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 06/12] btrfs: change lockdep class size check using ks->names Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:03 ` David Sterba
2022-02-08 19:14 ` [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1) Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-09 18:19 ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 18:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:02 ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:37 ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:45 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 20:17 ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10 0:27 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10 2:12 ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10 0:32 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10 19:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-10 19:27 ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10 20:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-11 5:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11 5:55 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220211103913.GR23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rburny@google.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox