Re: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: scrub: big renaming to address the page and sector difference

[David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:09:35PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >From the ancient day, btrfs doesn't support sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE, thus
> a lot of the old code consider one page == one sector, not only the
> behavior, but also the naming.
> 
> This is no longer true after v5.16 since we have subpage support.
> 
> One of the worst location is scrub, we have tons of things named like
> scrub_page, scrub_block::pagev, scrub_bio::pagev.
> 
> Even scrub for subpage is supported, the naming is not touched yet.
> 
> This patchset will first do the rename, providing the basis for later
> scrub enhancement for subpage.
> 
> This patchset should not bring any behavior change.
> 
> Qu Wenruo (3):
>   btrfs: scrub: rename members related to scrub_block::pagev
>   btrfs: scrub: rename scrub_page to scrub_sector
>   btrfs: scrub: rename scrub_bio::pagev and related members

This conflicts with the scrub refactoring, but applies cleanly on
misc-next. I think the rename could go in first as it's a less risky
change and any fixups or fine tuning of the refactoring would not affect
it.