From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: allow defrag to convert inline extents to regular extents
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 10:56:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220509095630.GA2270453@falcondesktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c26d8d377147d3a80e352ee31e432591c28e3f4b.1651905487.git.wqu@suse.com>
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 02:39:27PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Btrfs defaults to max_inline=2K to make small writes inlined into
> metadata.
>
> The default value is always a win, as even DUP/RAID1/RAID10 doubles the
> metadata usage, it should still cause less physical space used compared
> to a 4K regular extents.
>
> But since the introduce of RAID1C3 and RAID1C4 it's no longer the case,
> users may find inlined extents causing too much space wasted, and want
> to convert those inlined extents back to regular extents.
>
> Unfortunately defrag will unconditionally skip all inline extents, no
> matter if the user is trying to converting them back to regular extents.
>
> So this patch will add a small exception for defrag_collect_targets() to
> allow defragging inline extents, if and only if the inlined extents are
> larger than max_inline, allowing users to convert them to regular ones.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 9d8e46815ee4..852c49565ab2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -1420,8 +1420,19 @@ static int defrag_collect_targets(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
> if (!em)
> break;
>
> - /* Skip hole/inline/preallocated extents */
> - if (em->block_start >= EXTENT_MAP_LAST_BYTE ||
> + /*
> + * If the file extent is an inlined one, we may still want to
> + * defrag it (fallthrough) if it will cause a regular extent.
> + * This is for users who want to convert inline extents to
> + * regular ones through max_inline= mount option.
> + */
> + if (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE &&
> + em->len <= inode->root->fs_info->max_inline)
> + goto next;
> +
> + /* Skip hole/delalloc/preallocated extents */
> + if (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_HOLE ||
> + em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_DELALLOC ||
> test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PREALLOC, &em->flags))
> goto next;
>
> @@ -1480,6 +1491,15 @@ static int defrag_collect_targets(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
> if (em->len >= get_extent_max_capacity(em))
> goto next;
>
> + /*
> + * For inline extent it should be the first extent and it
> + * should not have a next extent.
This is misleading.
As you know, and we've discussed this in a few threads in the past, there are
at least a couple causes where we can have an inline extent followed by other
extents. One has to do with compresson and the other with fallocate.
So either this part of the comment should be rephrased or go away.
This is also a good oppurtunity to convert cases where we have an inlined
compressed extent followed by one (or more) extents:
$ mount -o compress /dev/sdi /mnt
$ xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 4K" -c "pwrite -S 0xcd -b 16K 4K 16K" /mnt/foobar
In this case a defrag could mark the [0, 20K[ for defrag and we end up saving
both data and metadata space (one less extent item in the fs tree and maybe in
the extent tree too).
Thanks.
> + * If the inlined extent passed all above checks, just add it
> + * for defrag, and be converted to regular extents.
> + */
> + if (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE)
> + goto add;
> +
> next_mergeable = defrag_check_next_extent(&inode->vfs_inode, em,
> extent_thresh, newer_than, locked);
> if (!next_mergeable) {
> --
> 2.36.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-07 6:39 [PATCH] btrfs: allow defrag to convert inline extents to regular extents Qu Wenruo
2022-05-09 2:15 ` Anand Jain
2022-05-09 2:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-09 2:22 ` Anand Jain
2022-05-09 9:56 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-05-09 11:12 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-09 11:29 ` Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220509095630.GA2270453@falcondesktop \
--to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox