Re: [PATCH v4 07/13] btrfs: zoned: use generic btrfs zone helpers to support npo2 zoned devices

Pankaj Raghav
2022-05-18T09:42:11Z

On 2022-05-17 14:30, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 06:54:10PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
>> Add helpers to calculate alignment, round up and round down
>> for zoned devices. These helpers encapsulates the necessary handling for
>> power_of_2 and non-power_of_2 zone sizes. Optimized calculations are
>> performed for zone sizes that are power_of_2 with log and shifts.
>>
>> btrfs_zoned_is_aligned() is added instead of reusing bdev_zone_aligned()
>> helper due to some use cases in btrfs where zone alignment is checked
>> before having access to the underlying block device such as in this
>> function: btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info().
>>
>> Use the generic btrfs zone helpers to calculate zone index, check zone
>> alignment, round up and round down operations.
>>
>> The zone_size_shift field is not needed anymore as generic helpers are
>> used for calculation.
>
> Overall this looks reasonable to me.
>
>> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 24 +++++++++-------
>> fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> fs/btrfs/zoned.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
>> @@ -1108,14 +1101,14 @@ int btrfs_reset_device_zone(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 physical,
>> int btrfs_ensure_empty_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 start, u64 size)
>> {
>> struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zinfo = device->zone_info;
>> - const u8 shift = zinfo->zone_size_shift;
>> - unsigned long begin = start >> shift;
>> - unsigned long end = (start + size) >> shift;
>> + unsigned long begin = bdev_zone_no(device->bdev, start >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
>> + unsigned long end =
>> + bdev_zone_no(device->bdev, (start + size) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
>
> There are unsinged long types here though I'd rather see u64, better for
> a separate patch. Fixed width types are cleaner here and in the zoned
> code as there's always some conversion to/from sectors.
>
Ok. I will probably send a separate patch to convert them to fix width
types. Is it ok if I do it as a separate patch instead of including it
in this series?
>> u64 pos;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(start, zinfo->zone_size));
>> - ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(size, zinfo->zone_size));
>> + ASSERT(btrfs_zoned_is_aligned(start, zinfo->zone_size));
>> + ASSERT(btrfs_zoned_is_aligned(size, zinfo->zone_size));
>>
>> if (end > zinfo->nr_zones)
>> return -ERANGE;
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.h
>> @@ -30,6 +30,36 @@ struct btrfs_zoned_device_info {
>> u32 sb_zone_location[BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX];
>> };
>>
>> +static inline bool btrfs_zoned_is_aligned(u64 pos, u64 zone_size)
>> +{
>> + u64 remainder = 0;
>> +
>> + if (is_power_of_two_u64(zone_size))
>> + return IS_ALIGNED(pos, zone_size);
>> +
>> + div64_u64_rem(pos, zone_size, &remainder);
>> + return remainder == 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline u64 btrfs_zoned_roundup(u64 pos, u64 zone_size)
>> +{
>> + if (is_power_of_two_u64(zone_size))
>> + return ALIGN(pos, zone_size);
>
> Please use round_up as the rounddown helper uses round_down
>
Ah, good catch. I will use it instead. Thanks.
>> +
>> + return div64_u64(pos + zone_size - 1, zone_size) * zone_size;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline u64 btrfs_zoned_rounddown(u64 pos, u64 zone_size)
>> +{
>> + u64 remainder = 0;
>> + if (is_power_of_two_u64(zone_size))
>> + return round_down(pos, zone_size);
>> +
>> + div64_u64_rem(pos, zone_size, &remainder);
>> + pos -= remainder;
>> + return pos;
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>> int btrfs_get_dev_zone(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
>> struct blk_zone *zone);