From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs: introduce new read-repair infrastructure
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 10:28:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220526082851.GA26556@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78c1fb7f-60b7-b8fd-6e3c-c207122863aa@gmx.com>
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 04:26:30PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/5/26 16:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 04:07:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> Then it can be said to almost all ENOSPC error handling code.
>>
>> ENOSPC is a lot more common.
>
> Sorry, I mean ENOMEM.
>
>>
>>> It's less than 1% chance, but we spend over 10% code for it.
>>>
>>> And if you really want to go that path, I see no reason why we didn't go
>>> sector-by-sector repair.
>>
>> Because that really sucks for the case where the whole I/O fails.
>> Which is the common failure scenario.
>
> But it's just a performance problem, which is not that critical.
I'm officially lost now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-26 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-25 10:59 [PATCH v2 0/7] btrfs: read-repair rework based on bitmap Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] btrfs: save the original bi_iter into btrfs_bio for buffered read Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] btrfs: make repair_io_failure available outside of extent_io.c Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] btrfs: add a btrfs_map_bio_wait helper Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs: introduce new read-repair infrastructure Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 3:06 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-26 7:37 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-26 7:52 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-26 8:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-26 8:26 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 8:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-05-26 8:49 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-26 8:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-26 9:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-27 8:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] btrfs: make buffered read path to use the new read repair infrastructure Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] btrfs: make direct io " Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] btrfs: remove io_failure_record infrastructure completely Qu Wenruo
2022-05-25 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] btrfs: read-repair rework based on bitmap David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220526082851.GA26556@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox