From: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2 RFC] device type and create chunk
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 14:53:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220713145324.67650a0d@gecko> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1657275159.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2030 bytes --]
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 19:14:50 +0800
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> wrote:
> v2: Arrange devices by type and then by free space. Split device type and
> its latency into an enum array. (Kdave)
> Marked RFC to obtain more feedback.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1642518245.git.anand.jain@oracle.com/t/
>
> -------- original cover letter -----
>
> I had these patches as part of experiments with the readpolicy I am
> sending it now. This is different from the allocation_hint mode patch-set
> where I use the device type to make the allocation destination automatic.
IMHO this auto-detection is not worth it. Everyone else (lvmcache, bcache,
dm-writecache, etc.) has the user specify manually which devices is the
faster one and if you set up a new storage array you'll have to think
about this anyway.
I'd like for btrfs to be boring and not differ from other
implementations if possible.
> Patch 1/2 keeps the device's type in the struct btrfs_device so that we
> could maintain the status if there are mixed devices in the
> filesystem.
>
> And if so, then patch 2/2 shall take care of arranging the disks by the
> order of latency so that metadata chunks can pick disk with low latency
> and data can pick the disk with higher latency.
>
> By having fewer restrictions and not hard coding the chunk allocation
> destination helps to cause the spillover to the available disk space
> instead of causing the spurious ENOSPC.
If we only let the user set allocation _hints_ (e.g. prefer this device
over that) that won't be a problem.
Regards,
Lukas Straub
> Anand Jain (2):
> btrfs: keep device type in the struct btrfs_device
> btrfs: create chunk device type latency aware
>
> fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 1 +
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 24 ++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
--
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-13 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-11 11:14 [PATCH 0/2 v2 RFC] device type and create chunk Anand Jain
2022-07-13 14:53 ` Lukas Straub [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220713145324.67650a0d@gecko \
--to=lukasstraub2@web.de \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox