From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] btrfs: shrink the size of struct btrfs_delayed_item
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:29:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220822152921.GY13489@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822141532.GA3129988@falcondesktop>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 03:15:32PM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 03:43:26PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:22:42PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> > > }
> > >
> > > item->index = index;
> > > - item->ins_or_del = BTRFS_DELAYED_DELETION_ITEM;
> > >
> > > ret = btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata(trans, item);
> > > /*
> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h
> > > index fd6fe785f748..729d352ca8a1 100644
> > > --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h
> > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h
> > > @@ -16,9 +16,10 @@
> > > #include <linux/refcount.h>
> > > #include "ctree.h"
> > >
> > > -/* types of the delayed item */
> > > -#define BTRFS_DELAYED_INSERTION_ITEM 1
> > > -#define BTRFS_DELAYED_DELETION_ITEM 2
> > > +enum btrfs_delayed_item_type {
> > > + BTRFS_DELAYED_INSERTION_ITEM,
> > > + BTRFS_DELAYED_DELETION_ITEM
> > > +};
> > >
> > > struct btrfs_delayed_root {
> > > spinlock_t lock;
> > > @@ -80,8 +81,9 @@ struct btrfs_delayed_item {
> > > u64 bytes_reserved;
> > > struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
> > > refcount_t refs;
> > > - int ins_or_del;
> > > - u32 data_len;
> > > + enum btrfs_delayed_item_type type:1;
> >
> > Bit fields next to atomicly accessed variables could be problemantic on
> > architectures without safe unaligned access. Either this can be :8 or
> > moved after 'key' where's a 7 byte hole.
>
> Yep, I forgot that.
>
> The 'key' doesn't exist anymore, it was removed in a previous patch of
> the series, so the 7 bytes holes is not there anymore.
Right, I did not check on the exact commit first.
> I don't see any other place in the structure where I can move the fields
> and still reduce its size. If switching from :1 to :8 is enough to
> guarantee safety, I guess it's the only solution.
Yeah that's find and there's only one byte unused, leaving the char
data[] aligned to 8 bytes:
struct btrfs_delayed_item {
struct rb_node rb_node __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 0 24 */
u64 index; /* 24 8 */
struct list_head tree_list; /* 32 16 */
struct list_head readdir_list; /* 48 16 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
u64 bytes_reserved; /* 64 8 */
struct btrfs_delayed_node * delayed_node; /* 72 8 */
refcount_t refs; /* 80 4 */
enum btrfs_delayed_item_type type:8; /* 84: 0 4 */
/* XXX 8 bits hole, try to pack */
/* Bitfield combined with next fields */
u16 data_len; /* 86 2 */
char data[]; /* 88 0 */
/* size: 88, cachelines: 2, members: 10 */
/* sum members: 86 */
/* sum bitfield members: 8 bits, bit holes: 1, sum bit holes: 8 bits */
/* forced alignments: 1 */
/* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
> Do you me to send a new version just to switch :1 to :8 or will you do
> that change?
I'll do that, it's a simple change but I wanted to let you know about
that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-17 11:22 [PATCH 00/15] btrfs: some updates to delayed items and inode logging fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 01/15] btrfs: don't drop dir index range items when logging a directory fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 02/15] btrfs: remove the root argument from log_new_dir_dentries() fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 03/15] btrfs: update stale comment for log_new_dir_dentries() fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 04/15] btrfs: free list element sooner at log_new_dir_dentries() fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 05/15] btrfs: avoid memory allocation at log_new_dir_dentries() for common case fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 06/15] btrfs: remove root argument from btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata() fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 07/15] btrfs: store index number instead of key in struct btrfs_delayed_item fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 08/15] btrfs: remove unused logic when looking up delayed items fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 09/15] btrfs: shrink the size of struct btrfs_delayed_item fdmanana
2022-08-22 13:43 ` David Sterba
2022-08-22 14:15 ` Filipe Manana
2022-08-22 15:29 ` David Sterba [this message]
2022-08-22 16:00 ` Filipe Manana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 10/15] btrfs: search for last logged dir index if it's not cached in the inode fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 11/15] btrfs: move need_log_inode() to above log_conflicting_inodes() fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 12/15] btrfs: move log_new_dir_dentries() above btrfs_log_inode() fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 13/15] btrfs: log conflicting inodes without holding log mutex of the initial inode fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 14/15] btrfs: skip logging parent dir when conflicting inode is not a dir fdmanana
2022-08-17 11:22 ` [PATCH 15/15] btrfs: use delayed items when logging a directory fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] btrfs: some updates to delayed items and inode logging fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] btrfs: don't drop dir index range items when logging a directory fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] btrfs: remove the root argument from log_new_dir_dentries() fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] btrfs: update stale comment for log_new_dir_dentries() fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] btrfs: free list element sooner at log_new_dir_dentries() fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] btrfs: avoid memory allocation at log_new_dir_dentries() for common case fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] btrfs: remove root argument from btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata() fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] btrfs: store index number instead of key in struct btrfs_delayed_item fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] btrfs: remove unused logic when looking up delayed items fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] btrfs: shrink the size of struct btrfs_delayed_item fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] btrfs: search for last logged dir index if it's not cached in the inode fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] btrfs: move need_log_inode() to above log_conflicting_inodes() fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] btrfs: move log_new_dir_dentries() above btrfs_log_inode() fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] btrfs: log conflicting inodes without holding log mutex of the initial inode fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] btrfs: skip logging parent dir when conflicting inode is not a dir fdmanana
2022-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] btrfs: use delayed items when logging a directory fdmanana
2022-08-22 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] btrfs: some updates to delayed items and inode logging David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220822152921.GY13489@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox