From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F6FECAAD5 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 11:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229876AbiICLW3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 07:22:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48812 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229586AbiICLW2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2022 07:22:28 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 529B86B15C for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 04:22:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1662204147; x=1693740147; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Rh95A/TICuY0+rk3SH895uc1qVtQXetp7SXdDKTPP+g=; b=I3ESd5XyegWyY+aIsWup57H/iKX60OfL15fkmaBsJU6VnCPm9DBHY0uQ Gn6pbKkgEbB1kPAT+kGZ9Fms8fEpicQe/dWvnaRia9dAlNIjahmnzpvcB K/MXlcKG3f+/1jSoFtrayZHYQXj3fKXpxqbzYY+VjYpLcwvJ2pXYrUu1r eMQLqphA/MUbhm7+EtENNIyoBEAmHasZlGDJHZcFz56jsx440/YatpFAY Hnl+RQnnnkizRxfXd/nOXsQfFHsIM6kfF1f2eTsO6JfLwewTuTBMCVY5c NIa03tmro1KrqZFZshYlfN0k9d78eEQBLxgG5PkXQLN/Iw4wkhwlgP+PV Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10458"; a="297445173" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,287,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="297445173" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2022 04:22:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,287,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="788928076" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 95dfd251caa2) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2022 04:22:25 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 95dfd251caa2 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oUREG-0001YW-2Z; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:22:24 +0000 Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 19:22:09 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [PATCH PoC 9/9] btrfs: scrub: implement recoverable sectors report for scrub_fs Message-ID: <202209031950.mB6jb2hL-lkp@intel.com> References: <06e4f67a9e50c2b6dfc49a086ee62053cbdcc0ae.1662191784.git.wqu@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <06e4f67a9e50c2b6dfc49a086ee62053cbdcc0ae.1662191784.git.wqu@suse.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Hi Qu, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on kdave/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.0-rc3 next-20220901] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Qu-Wenruo/btrfs-scrub-introduce-a-new-family-of-ioctl-scrub_fs/20220903-162128 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next config: arm-randconfig-r032-20220903 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220903/202209031950.mB6jb2hL-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c55b41d5199d2394dd6cdb8f52180d8b81d809d4) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install arm cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/e6387ecfd7e78ac47fca972ef76f3286e6cd3900 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Qu-Wenruo/btrfs-scrub-introduce-a-new-family-of-ioctl-scrub_fs/20220903-162128 git checkout e6387ecfd7e78ac47fca972ef76f3286e6cd3900 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm SHELL=/bin/bash fs/btrfs/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> fs/btrfs/scrub.c:5382:6: warning: variable 'nr_good' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] int nr_good = 0; ^ 1 warning generated. vim +/nr_good +5382 fs/btrfs/scrub.c 5376 5377 static void scrub_fs_recover_data(struct scrub_fs_ctx *sfctx, int sector_nr) 5378 { 5379 struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sfctx->fs_info; 5380 const bool has_csum = !!sfctx->sectors[sector_nr].csum; 5381 bool mismatch_found = false; > 5382 int nr_good = 0; 5383 int io_fail = 0; 5384 int mirror_nr; 5385 5386 for (mirror_nr = 0; mirror_nr < sfctx->nr_copies; mirror_nr++) { 5387 struct scrub_fs_sector *sector = 5388 scrub_fs_get_sector(sfctx, sector_nr, mirror_nr); 5389 5390 if (sector->flags & SCRUB_FS_SECTOR_FLAG_GOOD) 5391 nr_good++; 5392 if (!(sector->flags & SCRUB_FS_SECTOR_FLAG_IO_DONE)) 5393 io_fail++; 5394 } 5395 5396 if (has_csum) { 5397 /* 5398 * There is at least one good copy, thus all the other 5399 * corrupted sectors can also be recovered. 5400 */ 5401 for (mirror_nr = 0; mirror_nr < sfctx->nr_copies; mirror_nr++) { 5402 struct scrub_fs_sector *sector = 5403 scrub_fs_get_sector(sfctx, sector_nr, mirror_nr); 5404 5405 if (sector->flags & SCRUB_FS_SECTOR_FLAG_GOOD) 5406 continue; 5407 sector->flags |= SCRUB_FS_SECTOR_FLAG_RECOVERABLE; 5408 sfctx->stat.data_recoverable += fs_info->sectorsize; 5409 } 5410 5411 /* Place holder for writeback */ 5412 return; 5413 } 5414 5415 /* 5416 * No datasum case, it's much harder. 5417 * 5418 * The idea is, we have to compare all the sectors to determine if they 5419 * match. 5420 * 5421 * Firstly rule out sectors which don't have extra working copies. 5422 */ 5423 if (sfctx->nr_copies - io_fail <= 1) { 5424 sfctx->stat.data_nocsum_uncertain += fs_info->sectorsize; 5425 return; 5426 } 5427 5428 /* 5429 * For now, we can only support one case, all data read matches with each 5430 * other, or we consider them all uncertain. 5431 */ 5432 for (mirror_nr = 0; mirror_nr < sfctx->nr_copies - 1; mirror_nr++) { 5433 struct scrub_fs_sector *sector = 5434 scrub_fs_get_sector(sfctx, sector_nr, mirror_nr); 5435 struct scrub_fs_sector *next_sector; 5436 int ret; 5437 5438 /* The first sector has IO error, skip to the next run. */ 5439 if (!(sector->flags & SCRUB_FS_SECTOR_FLAG_IO_DONE)) 5440 continue; 5441 5442 next_sector = scrub_fs_find_next_working_mirror(sfctx, 5443 sector_nr, mirror_nr); 5444 /* We're already the last working copy, can break now. */ 5445 if (!next_sector) 5446 break; 5447 5448 ret = scrub_fs_memcmp_sectors(sfctx, sector, next_sector); 5449 if (ret) 5450 mismatch_found = true; 5451 } 5452 5453 /* 5454 * We have found mismatched contents, mark all those sectors 5455 * which doesn't have IO error as uncertain. 5456 */ 5457 if (mismatch_found) 5458 sfctx->stat.data_nocsum_uncertain += 5459 (sfctx->nr_copies - io_fail) << fs_info->sectorsize_bits; 5460 } 5461 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp