From: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: loosen the block-group-tree feature dependency check
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:31:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220923113120.DC30.409509F4@e16-tech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d43e26ecf12268e8bc75986052cc6021a096db74.1662961395.git.wqu@suse.com>
Hi,
> [BUG]
> When one user did a wrong try to clear block group tree, which can not
> be done through mount option, by using "-o clear_cache,space_cache=v2",
> it will cause the following error on a fs with block-group-tree feature:
>
> BTRFS info (device dm-1): force clearing of disk cache
> BTRFS info (device dm-1): using free space tree
> BTRFS info (device dm-1): clearing free space tree
> BTRFS info (device dm-1): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE (0x1)
> BTRFS info (device dm-1): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID (0x2)
> BTRFS error (device dm-1): block-group-tree feature requires fres-space-tree and no-holes
> BTRFS error (device dm-1): super block corruption detected before writing it to disk
> BTRFS: error (device dm-1) in write_all_supers:4318: errno=-117 Filesystem corrupted (unexpected superblock corruption detected)
> BTRFS warning (device dm-1: state E): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
>
> [CAUSE]
> Although the dependency for block-group-tree feature is just an
> artificial one (to reduce test matrix), we put the dependency check into
> btrfs_validate_super().
>
> This is too strict, and during space cache clearing, we will have a
> window where free space tree is cleared, and we need to commit the super
> block.
>
> In that window, we had block group tree without v2 cache, and triggered
> the artificial dependency check.
>
> This is not necessary at all, especially for such a soft dependency.
>
> [FIX]
> Introduce a new helper, btrfs_check_features(), to do all the runtime
> limitation checks, including:
>
> - Unsupported incompat flags check
>
> - Unsupported compat RO flags check
>
> - Setting missing incompat flags
>
> - Aritifical feature dependency checks
> Currently only block group tree will rely on this.
>
> - Subpage runtime check for v1 cache
>
> With this helper, we can move quite some checks from
> open_ctree()/btrfs_remount() into it, and just call it after
> btrfs_parse_options().
>
> Now "-o clear_cache,space_cache=v2" will not trigger above error
> anymore.
btrfs misc-next broken fstests btrfs/056 and more tests.
dmesg output of fstests btrfs/056 failure.
[ 658.119910] BTRFS error (device dm-0): cannot replay dirty log with unsupported compat_ro features (0x3), try rescue=nologreplay
It seems that the root reason is this patch.
this patch or xfstests need to be fixed?
Best Regards
Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
2022/09/23
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 1 +
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 19 +----
> 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 54b5784a59e5..d50df66d6ce9 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -3292,6 +3292,114 @@ int btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Do various sanity and dependency checks on different features.
> + *
> + * This is the place for less strict checks (like for subpage or artificial
> + * feature dependency).
> + *
> + * For strict checks or possible corruption detection, they should go
> + * btrfs_validate_super().
> + *
> + * This function also should be called after btrfs_parse_option(), as some
> + * mount option (space_cache related) can modify on-disk format like free
> + * space tree and screw up certain feature dependency.
> + */
> +int btrfs_check_features(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
> + u64 incompat = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(disk_super);
> + u64 compat_ro = btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(disk_super);
> +
> + if (incompat & ~BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP) {
> + btrfs_err(fs_info,
> + "cannot mount because of unsupported optional features (0x%llx)",
> + incompat);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Runtime limitation for mixed block groups. */
> + if ((incompat & BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS) &&
> + (fs_info->sectorsize != fs_info->nodesize)) {
> + btrfs_err(fs_info,
> +"unequal nodesize/sectorsize (%u != %u) are not allowed for mixed block groups",
> + fs_info->nodesize, fs_info->sectorsize);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Mixed backref is an always-enabled feature. */
> + incompat |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_BACKREF;
> +
> + /* Set compression related flags just in case. */
> + if (fs_info->compress_type == BTRFS_COMPRESS_LZO)
> + incompat |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_COMPRESS_LZO;
> + else if (fs_info->compress_type == BTRFS_COMPRESS_ZSTD)
> + incompat |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_COMPRESS_ZSTD;
> +
> + /*
> + * An ancient flag, which should really be marked deprecated.
> + * Such runtime limitation doesn't really need a incompat flag.
> + */
> + if (btrfs_super_nodesize(disk_super) > PAGE_SIZE)
> + incompat |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_BIG_METADATA;
> +
> + if (compat_ro & ~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP && !sb_rdonly(sb)) {
> + btrfs_err(fs_info,
> + "cannot mount read-write because of unsupported optional features (0x%llx)",
> + compat_ro);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + /*
> + * We have unsupported RO compat features, although RO mounted, we
> + * should not cause any metadata write, including log replay.
> + * Or we could screw up whatever the new feature requires.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(compat_ro && btrfs_super_log_root(disk_super) &&
> + !btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, NOLOGREPLAY))) {
> + btrfs_err(fs_info,
> +"cannot replay dirty log with unsupported compat_ro features (0x%llx), try rescue=nologreplay",
> + compat_ro);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Artificial limitations for block group tree, to force
> + * block-group-tree to rely on no-holes and free-space-tree.
> + * Mostly to reduce test matrix.
> + */
> + if (btrfs_fs_compat_ro(fs_info, BLOCK_GROUP_TREE) &&
> + (!btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, NO_HOLES) ||
> + !btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, FREE_SPACE_TREE))) {
> + btrfs_err(fs_info,
> +"block-group-tree feature requires no-holes and free-space-tree features");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Subpage runtime limitation on v1 cache.
> + *
> + * V1 space cache still has some hard code PAGE_SIZE usage, while
> + * we're already defaulting to v2 cache, no need to bother
> + * v1 as it's going to be deprecated anyway.
> + */
> + if (fs_info->sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE &&
> + btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SPACE_CACHE)) {
> + btrfs_warn(fs_info,
> + "v1 space cache is not supported for page size %lu with sectorsize %u",
> + PAGE_SIZE, fs_info->sectorsize);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + /*
> + * This function can be called by remount, thus we need spinlock to
> + * protect the super block.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&fs_info->super_lock);
> + btrfs_set_super_incompat_flags(disk_super, incompat);
> + spin_unlock(&fs_info->super_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
> char *options)
> {
> @@ -3441,72 +3549,12 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
> goto fail_alloc;
> }
>
> - features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(disk_super) &
> - ~BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP;
> - if (features) {
> - btrfs_err(fs_info,
> - "cannot mount because of unsupported optional features (0x%llx)",
> - features);
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - goto fail_alloc;
> - }
> -
> - features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(disk_super);
> - features |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_BACKREF;
> - if (fs_info->compress_type == BTRFS_COMPRESS_LZO)
> - features |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_COMPRESS_LZO;
> - else if (fs_info->compress_type == BTRFS_COMPRESS_ZSTD)
> - features |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_COMPRESS_ZSTD;
> -
> - /*
> - * Flag our filesystem as having big metadata blocks if they are bigger
> - * than the page size.
> - */
> - if (btrfs_super_nodesize(disk_super) > PAGE_SIZE)
> - features |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_BIG_METADATA;
> -
> - /*
> - * mixed block groups end up with duplicate but slightly offset
> - * extent buffers for the same range. It leads to corruptions
> - */
> - if ((features & BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS) &&
> - (sectorsize != nodesize)) {
> - btrfs_err(fs_info,
> -"unequal nodesize/sectorsize (%u != %u) are not allowed for mixed block groups",
> - nodesize, sectorsize);
> - goto fail_alloc;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Needn't use the lock because there is no other task which will
> - * update the flag.
> - */
> - btrfs_set_super_incompat_flags(disk_super, features);
> -
> - features = btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(disk_super) &
> - ~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP;
> - if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && features) {
> - btrfs_err(fs_info,
> - "cannot mount read-write because of unsupported optional features (0x%llx)",
> - features);
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - goto fail_alloc;
> - }
> - /*
> - * We have unsupported RO compat features, although RO mounted, we
> - * should not cause any metadata write, including log replay.
> - * Or we could screw up whatever the new feature requires.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(features && btrfs_super_log_root(disk_super) &&
> - !btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, NOLOGREPLAY))) {
> - btrfs_err(fs_info,
> -"cannot replay dirty log with unsupported compat_ro features (0x%llx), try rescue=nologreplay",
> - features);
> - err = -EINVAL;
> + ret = btrfs_check_features(fs_info, sb);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + err = ret;
> goto fail_alloc;
> }
>
> -
> if (sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE) {
> struct btrfs_subpage_info *subpage_info;
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
> index 7e545ec09a10..c67c15d4d20b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
> void __cold close_ctree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
> int btrfs_validate_super(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> struct btrfs_super_block *sb, int mirror_num);
> +int btrfs_check_features(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct super_block *sb);
> int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int max_mirrors);
> struct btrfs_super_block *btrfs_read_dev_super(struct block_device *bdev);
> struct btrfs_super_block *btrfs_read_dev_one_super(struct block_device *bdev,
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index eb0ae7e396ef..b0aeecc932b2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -2014,14 +2014,10 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> if (ret)
> goto restore;
>
> - /* V1 cache is not supported for subpage mount. */
> - if (fs_info->sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE && btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SPACE_CACHE)) {
> - btrfs_warn(fs_info,
> - "v1 space cache is not supported for page size %lu with sectorsize %u",
> - PAGE_SIZE, fs_info->sectorsize);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + ret = btrfs_check_features(fs_info, sb);
> + if (ret < 0)
> goto restore;
> - }
> +
> btrfs_remount_begin(fs_info, old_opts, *flags);
> btrfs_resize_thread_pool(fs_info,
> fs_info->thread_pool_size, old_thread_pool_size);
> @@ -2117,15 +2113,6 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto restore;
> }
> - if (btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(fs_info->super_copy) &
> - ~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP) {
> - btrfs_err(fs_info,
> - "can not remount read-write due to unsupported optional flags 0x%llx",
> - btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(fs_info->super_copy) &
> - ~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto restore;
> - }
> if (fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices == 0) {
> ret = -EACCES;
> goto restore;
> --
> 2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-23 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-12 5:44 [PATCH] btrfs: loosen the block-group-tree feature dependency check Qu Wenruo
2022-09-20 23:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-09-21 9:46 ` David Sterba
2022-09-21 10:02 ` David Sterba
2022-09-23 3:31 ` Wang Yugui [this message]
2022-09-23 7:26 ` [PATCH] fixup btrfs: relax block-group-tree feature dependency checks Wang Yugui
2022-09-23 8:23 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-09-23 10:48 ` David Sterba
2022-09-23 8:27 ` [PATCH] btrfs: loosen the block-group-tree feature dependency check Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220923113120.DC30.409509F4@e16-tech.com \
--to=wangyugui@e16-tech.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox