linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	clm@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 39/46] btrfs: add KCSAN annotations for unlocked access to block_rsv->full
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:50:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221011145015.1622882-39-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221011145015.1622882-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit 748f553c3c4c4f175c6c834358632aff802d72cf ]

KCSAN reports that there's unlocked access mixed with locked access,
which is technically correct but is not a bug.  To avoid false alerts at
least from KCSAN, add annotation and use a wrapper whenever ->full is
accessed for read outside of lock.

It is used as a fast check and only advisory.  In the worst case the
block reserve is found !full and becomes full in the meantime, but
properly handled.

Depending on the value of ->full, btrfs_block_rsv_release decides
where to return the reservation, and block_rsv_release_bytes handles a
NULL pointer for block_rsv and if it's not NULL then it double checks
the full status under a lock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAAwBoOJDjei5Hnem155N_cJwiEkVwJYvgN-tQrwWbZQGhFU=cA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YvHU/vsXd7uz5V6j@hungrycats.org
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c   | 2 +-
 fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h   | 9 +++++++++
 fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
index 06be0644dd37..046caf14a4bb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ u64 btrfs_block_rsv_release(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	 */
 	if (block_rsv == delayed_rsv)
 		target = global_rsv;
-	else if (block_rsv != global_rsv && !delayed_rsv->full)
+	else if (block_rsv != global_rsv && !btrfs_block_rsv_full(delayed_rsv))
 		target = delayed_rsv;
 
 	if (target && block_rsv->space_info != target->space_info)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h
index 0c183709be00..578c3497a455 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h
@@ -92,4 +92,13 @@ static inline void btrfs_unuse_block_rsv(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, block_rsv, 0, NULL);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Fast path to check if the reserve is full, may be carefully used outside of
+ * locks.
+ */
+static inline bool btrfs_block_rsv_full(const struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv)
+{
+	return data_race(rsv->full);
+}
+
 #endif /* BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_H */
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index 4c87bf2abc14..49570ad23f2e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, unsigned int num_items,
 		 */
 		num_bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, num_items);
 		if (flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL &&
-		    delayed_refs_rsv->full == 0) {
+		    btrfs_block_rsv_full(delayed_refs_rsv) == 0) {
 			delayed_refs_bytes = num_bytes;
 			num_bytes <<= 1;
 		}
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, unsigned int num_items,
 		if (rsv->space_info->force_alloc)
 			do_chunk_alloc = true;
 	} else if (num_items == 0 && flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL &&
-		   !delayed_refs_rsv->full) {
+		   !btrfs_block_rsv_full(delayed_refs_rsv)) {
 		/*
 		 * Some people call with btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0)
 		 * because they can be throttled, but have some other mechanism
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-11 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20221011145015.1622882-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2022-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 23/46] btrfs: dump extra info if one free space cache has more bitmaps than it should Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 24/46] btrfs: add macros for annotating wait events with lockdep Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 25/46] btrfs: add lockdep annotations for num_writers wait event Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 26/46] btrfs: add lockdep annotations for num_extwriters " Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 27/46] btrfs: add lockdep annotations for transaction states wait events Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 28/46] btrfs: add lockdep annotations for pending_ordered wait event Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 29/46] btrfs: change the lockdep class of free space inode's invalidate_lock Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 30/46] btrfs: add lockdep annotations for the ordered extents wait event Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 31/46] btrfs: scrub: properly report super block errors in system log Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 32/46] btrfs: scrub: try to fix super block errors Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 33/46] btrfs: get rid of block group caching progress logic Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 23:46   ` Omar Sandoval
2022-10-13 17:55     ` Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 34/46] btrfs: don't print information about space cache or tree every remount Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 35/46] btrfs: call __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache_locked on cache load failure Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 36/46] btrfs: check superblock to ensure the fs was not modified at thaw time Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 37/46] btrfs: remove the unnecessary result variables Sasha Levin
2022-10-12 11:54   ` David Sterba
2022-10-13 17:56     ` Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 38/46] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_CANCEL_RESCAN Sasha Levin
2022-10-12 12:56   ` David Sterba
2022-10-12 23:12     ` Qu Wenruo
2022-10-13 17:56       ` Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:50 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2022-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 40/46] btrfs: separate out the eb and extent state leak helpers Sasha Levin
2022-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 41/46] btrfs: relax block-group-tree feature dependency checks Sasha Levin
2022-10-12 13:01   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221011145015.1622882-39-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).