public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.2 (updated merge log)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 02:38:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221213013829.GD5824@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09d56e5a-0e11-ca60-785a-7f06aedf1932@gmx.com>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 08:09:29AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > - raid56 reliability vs performance trade off
> >    - fix destructive RMW for raid5 data (raid6 still needs work) - do full RMW
> >      cycle for writes and verify all checksums before overwrite, this should
> >      prevent rewriting potentially corrupted data without notice
> 
> Unfortunately, the "RMW" term seems abused.

I used is as a shortcut but it's probably confusing, thanks for the
suggested updates.

> >    - stripes are cached in memory which should reduce the performance impact but
> >      still can hurt some workloads
> 
> The cache behavior is not changed in this big chunk of raid56 work, but 
> commit f6065f8edeb2 ("btrfs: raid56: don't trust any cached sector in 
> __raid56_parity_recover()") is still the main thing affecting recovery path.
> 
> Thus although we didn't change the cache policy, it will still be bad 
> for recovery cases (missing device, or some sector has mimsatch csum).

Yeah, there's no change but I felt it should be mentioned together with
the RMW as it'll be used more than before.

Linus, below is the complete merge log with the edits.

---
User visible features:

- raid56 reliability vs performance trade off
  - fix destructive RMW for raid5 data (raid6 still needs work) - do full
    checksum verification for all data during RMW cycle, this should prevent
    rewriting potentially corrupted data without notice
  - stripes are cached in memory which should reduce the performance impact but
    still can hurt some workloads
  - checksums are verified after repair again
  - this is the last option without introducing additional features (write
    intent bitmap, journal, another tree), the extra checksum read/verification
    was supposed to be avoided by the original implementation exactly for
    performance reasons but that caused all the reliability problems

- discard=async by default for devices that support it

- implement emergency flush reserve to avoid almost all unnecessary transaction
  aborts due to ENOSPC in cases where there are too many delayed refs or
  delayed allocation

- skip block group synchronization if there's no change in used bytes, can
  reduce transaction commit count for some workloads

Performance improvements:

- fiemap and lseek
  - overall speedup due to skipping unnecessary or duplicate searches (-40% run time)
  - cache some data structures and sharedness of extents (-30% run time)

- send
  - faster backref resolution when finding clones
  - cached leaf to root mapping for faster backref walking
  - improved clone/sharing detection
  - overall run time improvements (-70%)

Core:

- module initialization converted to a table of function pointers run in a
  sequence

- preparation for fscrypt, extend passing file names across calls, dir item can
  store encryption status

- raid56 updates
  - more accurate error tracking of sectors within stripe
  - simplify recovery path and remove dedicated endio worker kthread
  - simplify scrub call paths
  - refactoring to support the extra data checksum verification during RMW
    cycle

- tree block parentness checks consolidated and done at metadata read time

- improved error handling

- cleanups
  - move a lot of code for better synchronization between kernel and user space
    sources, split big files
  - enum cleanups
  - GFP flag cleanups
  - header file cleanups, prototypes, dependencies
  - redundant parameter cleanups
  - inline extent handling simplifications
  - inode parameter conversion
  - data structure cleanups, reductions, renames, merges

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-13  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-12 20:16 [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.2 David Sterba
2022-12-13  0:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-13  1:38   ` David Sterba [this message]
2022-12-13  5:00 ` pr-tracker-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221213013829.GD5824@suse.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox