From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AD7C54EBC for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233214AbjAJPdM (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:33:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40862 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239140AbjAJPcf (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:32:35 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAA44CE7; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 07:32:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 9BA4868BEB; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:32:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:32:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: David Sterba Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Dave Kleikamp , Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , Joseph Qi , Evgeniy Dushistov , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: remove write_one_page / folio_write_one Message-ID: <20230110153216.GA10159@lst.de> References: <20230108165645.381077-1-hch@lst.de> <20230109195309.GU11562@twin.jikos.cz> <20230110081653.GA11947@lst.de> <20230110130042.GA11562@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230110130042.GA11562@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:00:42PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:16:53AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 08:53:09PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > > The btrfs patches were sent separately some time ago, now merged to > > > misc-next with updated changelogs and with the suggested switch to folio > > > API in the 2nd patch. > > > > Yes, 7 weeks ago to be exact. I wish we could just feed everything > > together now that we've missed the previous merge window, as that > > makes patch juggling for Andrew and Matthew a lot simpler. > > The patches are not fixes so they should wait for the next merge window. Agreed. But it would be a lot simpler if we could queue them up in -mm with the other patches now that we've missed the previous merge window.