From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-5.4.y stable-5.10.y] btrfs: scan device in non-exclusive mode
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 15:02:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023040302-schnapps-egging-77d7@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de2889bd0a9ea5446c3473fe7b2086fbd954b9ab.1680496851.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 01:46:08PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> commit 50d281fc434cb8e2497f5e70a309ccca6b1a09f0 upstream.
>
> This fixes mkfs/mount/check failures due to race with systemd-udevd
> scan.
>
> During the device scan initiated by systemd-udevd, other user space
> EXCL operations such as mkfs, mount, or check may get blocked and result
> in a "Device or resource busy" error. This is because the device
> scan process opens the device with the EXCL flag in the kernel.
>
> Two reports were received:
>
> - btrfs/179 test case, where the fsck command failed with the -EBUSY
> error
>
> - LTP pwritev03 test case, where mkfs.vfs failed with
> the -EBUSY error, when mkfs.vfs tried to overwrite old btrfs filesystem
> on the device.
>
> In both cases, fsck and mkfs (respectively) were racing with a
> systemd-udevd device scan, and systemd-udevd won, resulting in the
> -EBUSY error for fsck and mkfs.
>
> Reproducing the problem has been difficult because there is a very
> small window during which these userspace threads can race to
> acquire the exclusive device open. Even on the system where the problem
> was observed, the problem occurrences were anywhere between 10 to 400
> iterations and chances of reproducing decreases with debug printk()s.
>
> However, an exclusive device open is unnecessary for the scan process,
> as there are no write operations on the device during scan. Furthermore,
> during the mount process, the superblock is re-read in the below
> function call chain:
>
> btrfs_mount_root
> btrfs_open_devices
> open_fs_devices
> btrfs_open_one_device
> btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb
>
> So, to fix this issue, removes the FMODE_EXCL flag from the scan
> operation, and add a comment.
>
> The case where mkfs may still write to the device and a scan is running,
> the btrfs signature is not written at that time so scan will not
> recognize such device.
>
> Reported-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202303170839.fdf23068-oliver.sang@intel.com
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
>
> The upstream commit 50d281fc434cb8e2497f5e70a309ccca6b1a09f0 can be
> applied without conflict to LTS stable-5.15.y and stable-6.1.y. However,
> on LTS stable-5.4.y and stable-5.15.y, a conflict fix is required since
> the zoned device support commits are not present in these versions. This
> patch resolves the conflicts.
Now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-03 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-03 5:46 [PATCH stable-5.4.y stable-5.10.y] btrfs: scan device in non-exclusive mode Anand Jain
2023-04-03 13:02 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023040302-schnapps-egging-77d7@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=sherry.yang@oracle.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox