linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: cycle through the RAID profiles as a last resort
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 21:07:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230721010743.GA1202486@perftesting> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230720222817.GB545904@zen>

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 03:28:17PM -0700, Boris Burkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 04:12:16PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Instead of looping through the RAID indices before advancing the FFE
> > loop lets move this until after we've exhausted the entire FFE loop in
> > order to give us the highest chance of success in satisfying the
> > allocation based on its flags.
> 
> Doesn't this get screwed by the find_free_extent_update_loop setting
> index to 0?
> 
> i.e., let's say we fail on the first pass with the correct raid flag.
> then we go into find_free_extent_update_loop and intelligently don't do
> the pointless raid loops. But then we set index to 0 and start doing an
> even worse meta loop of doing every step (including allocating chunks)
> with every raid index, most of which are doomed to fail by definition.
> 
> Not setting it to 0, OTOH, breaks the logic for setting "full_search",
> but I do think that could be fixed one way or another.
> 

Yeah lets drop this, a bunch of tests failed, I need to drop this and re-run and
see what happens.  I hate this code.  Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-21  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-20 20:12 [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: fix generic/475 hang Josef Bacik
2023-07-20 20:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: wait for block groups to finish caching during allocation Josef Bacik
2023-07-20 22:21   ` Boris Burkov
2023-07-20 20:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: move comments to btrfs_loop_type definition Josef Bacik
2023-07-20 22:28   ` Boris Burkov
2023-07-27 16:32   ` David Sterba
2023-07-20 20:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: cycle through the RAID profiles as a last resort Josef Bacik
2023-07-20 22:28   ` Boris Burkov
2023-07-21  1:07     ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2023-07-25 14:37   ` kernel test robot
2023-07-21  7:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: fix generic/475 hang Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230721010743.GA1202486@perftesting \
    --to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).