From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: hch@lst.de
Cc: clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, josef@toxicpanda.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
syzbot <syzbot+26860029a4d562566231@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [btrfs?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in btrfs_open_devices
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 17:50:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230808-zentimeter-kappen-5da1e70c5535@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000000000000094846060260e710@google.com>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 08:24:36PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
>
> commit 066d64b26a21a5b5c500a30f27f3e4b1959aac9e
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Wed Aug 2 15:41:23 2023 +0000
>
> btrfs: open block devices after superblock creation
>
> bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=15493371a80000
> start commit: f7dc24b34138 Add linux-next specific files for 20230807
> git tree: linux-next
> final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=17493371a80000
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13493371a80000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d7847c9dca13d6c5
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=26860029a4d562566231
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=179704c9a80000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17868ba9a80000
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+26860029a4d562566231@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 066d64b26a21 ("btrfs: open block devices after superblock creation")
>
> For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
I think the issue might be that before your patch the lifetime of:
@device was aligned with @device->s_fs_info but now that you're dropping
the uuid mutex after btrfs_scan_one_device() that isn't true anymore. So
it feels like:
P1 P2
lock_uuid_mutex;
device = btrfs_scan_one_device();
fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
unlock_uuid_mutex;
// earlier mount that gets cleaned up
lock_uuid_mutex;
btrfs_close_devices(fs_devices);
unlock_uuid_mutex;
lock_uuid_mutex;
btrfs_open_devices(fs_devices); // UAF
unlock_uuid_mutex;
But I'm not entirely sure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-07 20:51 [syzbot] [btrfs?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in btrfs_open_devices syzbot
2023-08-08 3:24 ` syzbot
2023-08-08 15:50 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-08-08 16:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-08-08 16:35 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-08 17:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-08-08 17:38 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230808-zentimeter-kappen-5da1e70c5535@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+26860029a4d562566231@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox