Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: btrfs/185 update for single device pseudo device-scan
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:21:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230912162158.GA962832@zen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4f62adc-a923-e253-2731-f27fb6cf5ae9@oracle.com>

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 05:07:49PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/09/2023 02:32, Boris Burkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:24:43AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> > > As we are obliterating the need for the device scan for the single device,
> > > which will return success if the basic superblock verification passes,
> > > even for the duplicate device of the mounted filesystem, drop the check
> > > for the return code in this testcase and continue to verify if the device
> > > path of the mounted filesystem remains unaltered after the scan.
> > > 
> > > Also, if the test fails, it leaves the local non-standard mount point
> > > remained mounted, leading to further test cases failing. Call unmount
> > > in _cleanup().
> > 
> > This was also affecting my setup, thanks for the fix!
> 
> Hmm, it shouldn't, unless commit d41f57d15a90 ("brfs: scan but don't
>  register device on single device filesystem") is already in the kernel
>  you are testing. Do you have the logs?

I was testing on top of misc-next and that patch was indeed present.

> 
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>

> > > ---
> > >   tests/btrfs/185 | 5 +++--
> > >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/185 b/tests/btrfs/185
> > > index ba0200617e69..c7b8d2d46951 100755
> > > --- a/tests/btrfs/185
> > > +++ b/tests/btrfs/185
> > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ mnt=$TEST_DIR/$seq.mnt
> > >   # Override the default cleanup function.
> > >   _cleanup()
> > >   {
> 
> 
> 
> > > +	$UMOUNT_PROG $mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> > 
> > Do you mean to umount before calling rm -rf on it? That seems.. risky.
> > 
> > >   	rm -rf $mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> 
> mnt is a special mount point. Removing the special mnt directory after
> unmounting it is correct..

D'oh, you're totally right, my bad!

> 
> 
> > >   	cd /
> > >   	rm -f $tmp.*
> > > @@ -51,9 +52,9 @@ for sb_bytenr in 65536 67108864; do
> > >   	echo ..:$? >> $seqres.full
> > >   done
> > > -# Original device is mounted, scan of its clone should fail
> > > +# Original device is mounted, scan of its clone must not alter the
> > > +# filesystem device path
> > >   $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan $device_2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > -[[ $? != 1 ]] && _fail "cloned device scan should fail"
> > >   [[ $(findmnt $mnt | grep -v TARGET | $AWK_PROG '{print $2}') != $device_1 ]] && \
> > >   						_fail "mounted device changed"
> > > -- 
> > > 2.39.3
> > > 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-12 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-06 16:24 [PATCH] fstests: btrfs/185 update for single device pseudo device-scan Anand Jain
2023-09-11 18:32 ` Boris Burkov
2023-09-12  9:07   ` Anand Jain
2023-09-12 16:21     ` Boris Burkov [this message]
2023-09-11 18:35 ` Boris Burkov
2023-09-12  9:00   ` Anand Jain
2023-09-12 12:34 ` Zorro Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230912162158.GA962832@zen \
    --to=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox