From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA39812E40; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X6kipn0I" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA22FC433C7; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:06:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1699347989; bh=7Ly4OM2ZT9sUuel1E6UbZEzeZO7DWAxSaQOEMrXEdHo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=X6kipn0I5G4QbPZeMULAxzyByDh1oxcRGZ7s5eDyuYEcxNzFyUFId0XAD5i5hIxGm uUxDLPgA9ce8hPjFV7LrtM7bQoS8zjGoCnxNQ9ngIy9Cc8WQtHAhtxWWoSDSOJcj8H UTsAhermqN6rtDIVQHyM66DodwecQLPfAnChsLwk9zNmoydK9yj76LwvjlcWZDS6C/ DQlxVORgNisQDgaSfitIiVaCP51shGZh2b+zuWRFkM7p3OQFNXqF+JOGQY/SdlYQhk yfU6QLS3+JOWNl/G8fDN18hy8njJuV/VKpSorsdd1oUkKp1WUE12iu4xYYrcskZmTp nl1fkEYbq3nJw== Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 10:06:18 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Josef Bacik Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Qu Wenruo , Amir Goldstein , Jan Kara , Chris Mason , David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fanotify support for btrfs sub-volumes Message-ID: <20231107-leiden-drinnen-913c37d86f37@brauner> References: <20231102051349.GA3292886@perftesting> <20231102-schafsfell-denkzettel-08da41113e24@brauner> <20231103-kursleiter-proklamieren-aae0a02aa1a4@brauner> <20231106-fragment-geweigert-1d80138523e5@brauner> <20231106-unser-fiskus-9d1eba9fc64c@brauner> <20231106224210.GA3812457@perftesting> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231106224210.GA3812457@perftesting> > But it doesn't appear to me there's agreement on the way forward. vfsmounts > aren't going to do anything from what I can tell, but I could very well be > missing some detail. And Christian doesn't seem to want that as a solution. No, I really don't. I still think that it is fine to add a statx() flag indicating that a file is located on a subvolume. That allows interested userspace to bounce to an ioctl() where you can give it additional information in whatever form you like.