From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: allow extent buffer helpers to skip cross-page handling
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:34:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231122133426.GA11264@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <721bab821198fc9b49d2795b2028ed6c436ab886.1700111928.git.wqu@suse.com>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 03:49:06PM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Currently btrfs extent buffer helpers are doing all the cross-page
> handling, as there is no guarantee that all those eb pages are
> contiguous.
>
> However on systems with enough memory, there is a very high chance the
> page cache for btree_inode are allocated with physically contiguous
> pages.
>
> In that case, we can skip all the complex cross-page handling, thus
> speeding up the code.
>
> This patch adds a new member, extent_buffer::addr, which is only set to
> non-NULL if all the extent buffer pages are physically contiguous.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Added to misc-next, thanks.
> ---
> Reason for RFC:
>
> This change would increase the code size for all extent buffer helpers,
> and since there one more branch introduced, it may even slow down the
> system if most ebs do not have physically contiguous pages.
> But I still believe this is worthy trying, as my previous attempt to
> use virtually contiguous pages are rejected due to possible slow down in
> vm_map() call.
>
> I don't have convincing benchmark yet, but so far no obvious performance
> drop observed either.
I've looked at the assembly code, it's "just" one test/jump in
frequently used functions but the slow path handling cross-page changes
is slow anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-22 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-16 5:19 [PATCH RFC] btrfs: allow extent buffer helpers to skip cross-page handling Qu Wenruo
2023-11-20 17:00 ` David Sterba
2023-11-20 20:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-11-21 15:35 ` David Sterba
2023-11-21 20:37 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-11-21 21:14 ` David Sterba
2023-11-21 21:30 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-11-22 13:23 ` David Sterba
2023-11-22 13:34 ` David Sterba [this message]
2023-11-22 13:46 ` David Sterba
2023-11-22 20:01 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-11-22 22:05 ` David Sterba
2023-11-23 18:50 ` David Sterba
2023-11-23 20:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-11-24 16:03 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231122133426.GA11264@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox