From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: migrate IO path to folios
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:27:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231213222731.GG3001@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1702347666.git.wqu@suse.com>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:58:35PM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [CHANGELOG]
> v2:
> - Fix a PAGE_SHIFT usage in the 3rd patch on the data read path
> I know this won't be touched any time soon, but considering it's
> really one patch away from enabling higher order folios for metadata,
> let's make the cleanup closer to perfection.
>
>
> One critical problem I hit the most during my initial higher order
> folios tests are, incorrect access to the pages which conflicts with the
> page flag policy.
>
> Since folio flags are only set to certain pages according to their
> policies (PF_ANY, PF_HEAD, PF_ONLY_HEAD, PF_NO_TAIL, PF_NO_COMPOUND and
> the most weird on PF_SECOND), setting page flags violating the policy
> would immedate lead to VM_BUG_ON().
>
> Thus no matter if we go compound page or folio, we can not go the
> page-by-page iteration helpers that easily.
> One of the hot spots which can lead to VM_BUG_ON()s are the endio
> helpers.
>
> So this patch would:
>
> - Make metadata set/get helpers to utilize folio interfaces
>
> - Make subpage code to accept folios directly
> This is to avoid btrfs_page_*() helpers to accept page pointers, which
> is another hot spot which uses page pointer a lot.
>
> - Migrate btrfs bio endio functions to utilize bio_for_each_folio_all()
> This completely removes the ability to direct access page pointers.
> Although we still need some extra folio_page(folio, 0) calls to keep
> compatible with existing helpers.
>
> And since we're here, also fix the choas of btrfs endio functions'
> naming scheme, now it would always be:
> end_bbio_<target>_(read|write)
> The <target> can be:
>
> - data
> For non-compressed and non-encoeded operations
>
> - compressed
> For compressed IO and encoded IO.
>
> - meta
>
> And since compressed IO path is utilizing unmapped pages (pages
> without an address_space), thus they don't touch the page flags.
> This makes compressed IO path a very good test bed for the initial
> introduction of higher order folio.
>
> Qu Wenruo (3):
> btrfs: migrate get_eb_page_index() and get_eb_offset_in_page() to
> folios
> btrfs: migrate subpage code to folio interfaces
> btrfs: migrate various btrfs end io functions to folios
Added to misc-next, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 2:28 [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: migrate IO path to folios Qu Wenruo
2023-12-12 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] btrfs: migrate get_eb_page_index() and get_eb_offset_in_page() " Qu Wenruo
2023-12-12 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs: migrate subpage code to folio interfaces Qu Wenruo
2023-12-12 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] btrfs: migrate various btrfs end io functions to folios Qu Wenruo
2023-12-13 22:27 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231213222731.GG3001@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox