From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: zoned: use rcu list for iterating devices to collect stats
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 19:35:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240123183537.GJ31555@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ab48353-2033-4ab6-8334-28859d5e9e0f@wdc.com>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 07:49:22AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 22.01.24 22:35, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 02:51:03AM -0800, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> >> As btrfs_zoned_should_reclaim only has to iterate the device list in order
> >> to collect stats on the device's total and used bytes, we don't need to
> >> take the full blown mutex, but can iterate the device list in a rcu_read
> >> context.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 6 +++---
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> >> index 168af9d000d1..b7e7b5a5a6fa 100644
> >> --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> >> @@ -2423,15 +2423,15 @@ bool btrfs_zoned_should_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> >> if (fs_info->bg_reclaim_threshold == 0)
> >> return false;
> >>
> >> - mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> >> - list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
> >> + rcu_read_lock();
> >> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
> >> if (!device->bdev)
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> total += device->disk_total_bytes;
> >> used += device->bytes_used;
> >> }
> >> - mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> >> + rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > This is basically only a hint and inaccuracies in the total or used
> > values would be transient, right? The sum is calculated each time the
> > funciton is called, not stored anywhere so in the unlikely case of
> > device removal it may skip reclaim once, but then pick it up later.
> > Any actual removal of the block groups in verified again and properly
> > locked in btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work().
> >
>
> Yes.
So please add it to the changelog as an explanation why the mutex -> rcu
switch is safe, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 10:51 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: zoned: kick reclaim earlier on fast zoned devices Johannes Thumshirn
2024-01-22 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: zoned: use rcu list for iterating devices to collect stats Johannes Thumshirn
2024-01-22 12:12 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-22 21:34 ` David Sterba
2024-01-23 7:49 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-01-23 18:35 ` David Sterba [this message]
2024-01-22 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: zoned: wake up cleaner sooner if needed Johannes Thumshirn
2024-01-22 12:22 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-22 12:30 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-01-22 14:39 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-22 14:43 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-01-22 15:26 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-22 23:51 ` Boris Burkov
2024-01-22 16:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: zoned: kick reclaim earlier on fast zoned devices Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240123183537.GJ31555@suse.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox