Re: [PATCH 0/7] btrfs-progs: zoned: proper "mkfs.btrfs -b" support

[David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>]

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:14:39PM +0000, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:39:38PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 06:51:26PM -0600, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> > > mkfs.btrfs -b <byte_count> on a zoned device has several issues listed
> > > below.
> > > 
> > > - The FS size needs to be larger than minimal size that can host a btrfs,
> > >   but its calculation does not consider non-SINGLE profile
> > > - The calculation also does not ensure tree-log BG and data relocation BG
> > > - It allows creating a FS not aligned to the zone boundary
> > > - It resets all device zones beyond the specified length
> > > 
> > > This series fixes the issues with some cleanups.
> > > 
> > > Patches 1 to 3 are clean up patches, so they should not change the behavior.
> > > 
> > > Patches 4 to 6 address the issues and the last patch adds a test case.
> > > 
> > > Naohiro Aota (7):
> > >   btrfs-progs: rename block_count to byte_count
> > >   btrfs-progs: mkfs: remove duplicated device size check
> > >   btrfs-progs: mkfs: unify zoned mode minimum size calc into
> > >     btrfs_min_dev_size()
> > >   btrfs-progs: mkfs: fix minimum size calculation for zoned
> > >   btrfs-progs: mkfs: check if byte_count is zone size aligned
> > >   btrfs-progs: support byte length for zone resetting
> > >   btrfs-progs: add test for zone resetting
> > 
> > I did a quick CI check, the mkfs tests fails. You can open a pull
> > request to get your changes tested (it can be just for the testing
> > purpose, if you note that I'll skip it until the final version).
> > 
> > https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/actions/runs/9081685951
> 
> Thank you. I just noticed some workflows are running on my btrfs-progs
> repository too.

Yes, the jobs are matched by the branch names and will start if you have
Actions enabled in the repository.