From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D9E88F68 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718241795; cv=none; b=KWxNJSCxXnBgS3A6yTON4CAvuqdLfi+Sm68k8bFKAam4EP4oF3oVT5f5iVBN/kSZVxr7AXzDTlFjkOx/lMbZYirffpuxY6ody0nTcEANnEInIhHTtEx7hQzrp+Yz+OXhWDmt5qJjg6FRLK1lR/kM1Y1TuP1Qry+XcpbTLmgjD6k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718241795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BnTvgCT2YTDpFbEVK+hSnXZ47pFcIWTRl6JGJX+rEgo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=coOAEemahCFqM1ILBZA0tDj9oet0kSoC7nydtbicU/2AoKLwRuAC5mmTxrkVMJiP06cnhdZ4HlzrzGC/XMUxRjT5UqGBK0/xXCZIN+6IyTrZczhr/QaxZgMRJdzIdpwX+XXXxUsIeKHKq8LRTMVI/BqqSP/ufFn/wbqbc3xn3rU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1765CAC7; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7412D13A9A; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id R1ItHP9JambIcAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:23:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 03:23:02 +0200 From: David Sterba To: David Sterba Cc: Qu Wenruo , Srivathsa Dara , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , Rajesh Sivaramasubramaniom , Junxiao Bi , "clm@fb.com" , "josef@toxicpanda.com" , "dsterba@suse.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: convert: Add 64 bit block numbers support Message-ID: <20240613012302.GV18508@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz References: <20240606102215.3695032-1-srivathsa.d.dara@oracle.com> <20240612203743.GQ18508@twin.jikos.cz> <20240613000200.GS18508@twin.jikos.cz> <20240613002301.GT18508@twin.jikos.cz> <2d1a8153-274b-481e-bb0a-63504d1cbe01@gmx.com> <20240613005255.GU18508@twin.jikos.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240613005255.GU18508@twin.jikos.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9A1765CAC7 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.00 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 02:52:55AM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 09:55:56AM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > > > > 在 2024/6/13 09:53, David Sterba 写道: > > [...] > > >> > > >> Any good idea to go forward? > > >> Update CI (which seems impossible) or make the mke2fs part as mayfail > > >> and skip it? > > > > > > I think using mayfail for mke2fs is the best option, I don't want to > > > check versions. The release of 1.46.5 is 2021-12-30, this is not that > > > old and likely widely used. Skipping the particular case is not a big > > > deal as it'll be covered on other testing instances. > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > Just add an extra comment on the situation. > > > > Although I really hope github CI can someday updates its infrastructures. > > The updates happen from time to time, following Ubuntu LTS releases. The > upstream repository is https://github.com/actions/runner-images. > > Now that I'm looking there it seems that 24.04 has been made available a > month ago but has to be selected explicitly, as ubuntu-latest is still > pointing to 22. > > Kernel version is 6.8 and e2fsprogs is 1.47 so the update can fix that > and we don't have to do the workarounds. I'll do a test and update the > CI files if everythings works. It still fails with 1.47.0: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/actions/runs/9492025265/job/26158483515 mke2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023) mke2fs: Device size reported to be zero. Invalid partition specified, or partition table wasn't reread after running fdisk, due to a modified partition being busy and in use. You may need to reboot to re-read your partition table.