Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.11

[David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>]

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:21:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 11:12, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> > There's a merge conflict caused by the latency fixes from last week in
> > extent_map.c:btrfs_scan_inode(), related commits 4e660ca3a98d931809734
> > and b3ebb9b7e92a928344a. Resolved in branch for-6.11-merged and that's
> > been in linux-next for a few days.
> 
> Oh, and I notice that my resolution is slightly different, but looks
> like the actual code is equivalent.
> 
> I kept the "q" logic that had been introduced by commit 4e660ca3a98d
> ("btrfs: use a regular rb_root instead of cached rb_root for
> extent_map_tree").
> 
> I don't know how you prefer the code, but it kept the two "while
> (node)" loops in that file looking similar.

That is fine, keeping the same style makes sense.

> Of course, they were very different in other respects (ie
> drop_all_extent_maps_fast() does all extents unconditionally with that
> retry logic, while btrfs_scan_inode() has that whole "bail out on any
> contention" model, so whatever.
> 
> Anyway, it all *looks* ok to me, but please go and double-check that I
> didn't mess something up.

Looks correct to me as well.