linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
To: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix comments in definition of struct btrfs_file_extent_item
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 11:20:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241002182040.GA3917419@zen.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241002164500.2775775-1-maharmstone@fb.com>

On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 05:44:45PM +0100, Mark Harmstone wrote:
> The comments in the definition of struct btrfs_file_extent_item were
> written while the FS was still in flux, and are no longer accurate.
> 
> The range [disk_bytenr, disk_num_bytes) is the same as the extent in the
> extent tree. There's no difference here between csummed and non-csummed
> extents, as the comments were implying. And the fields offset and
> num_bytes are in bytes, not file blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
> index fc29d273845d..5df54a11c74c 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
> @@ -1094,24 +1094,23 @@ struct btrfs_file_extent_item {
>  	__u8 type;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * disk space consumed by the extent, checksum blocks are included
> -	 * in these numbers
> +	 * The address and size of the referenced extent.  These should exactly
> +	 * match an entry in the extent tree.
>  	 *
>  	 * At this offset in the structure, the inline extent data start.
>  	 */
>  	__le64 disk_bytenr;
>  	__le64 disk_num_bytes;
>  	/*
> -	 * the logical offset in file blocks (no csums)
> -	 * this extent record is for.  This allows a file extent to point
> -	 * into the middle of an existing extent on disk, sharing it
> -	 * between two snapshots (useful if some bytes in the middle of the
> -	 * extent have changed
> +	 * The logical offset in bytes this extent record is for.
> +	 * This allows a file extent to point into the middle of an existing
> +	 * extent on disk, sharing it between two snapshots (useful if some
> +	 * bytes in the middle of the extent have changed)
>  	 */
>  	__le64 offset;
>  	/*
> -	 * the logical number of file blocks (no csums included).  This
> -	 * always reflects the size uncompressed and without encoding.
> +	 * The logical number of bytes.  This always reflects the size
> +	 * uncompressed and without encoding.
>  	 */
>  	__le64 num_bytes;
>  
> -- 
> 2.44.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-02 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-02 16:44 [PATCH] btrfs: fix comments in definition of struct btrfs_file_extent_item Mark Harmstone
2024-10-02 18:20 ` Boris Burkov [this message]
2024-10-02 21:21 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-10-04 10:03   ` Yuwei Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241002182040.GA3917419@zen.localdomain \
    --to=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maharmstone@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).