public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fstests: move fs-module reload to earlier in the run_section function
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:39:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241115163955.GD9425@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7af8f80173fab5408da86f5b3393e787659a81d6.1731683116.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>

On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 11:20:51PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Reload the module before each test, instead of later in run_section.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
>  check | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/check b/check
> index 9222cd7e4f81..d8ee73f48c77 100755
> --- a/check
> +++ b/check
> @@ -935,6 +935,15 @@ function run_section()
>  			continue
>  		fi
>  
> +		# Reload the module after each test to check for leaks or
> +		# other problems.

Hrmm.  The nice thing about doing the reload /after/ each test is that
unloading the module will purge any per-fs slab caches that the module
creates.  The slab teardown logs any forgotten objects while $seq still
points to the test that leaked those objects.  Granted it's not a 100%
solution (that job falls to kmemcheck) but it's a cheap check.

This change makes it so that if test N leaks something, fstests reports
them for test N+1.

--D

> +		if [ -n "${TEST_FS_MODULE_RELOAD}" ]; then
> +			_test_unmount 2> /dev/null
> +			_scratch_unmount 2> /dev/null
> +			modprobe -r fs-$FSTYP
> +			modprobe fs-$FSTYP
> +		fi
> +
>  		# record that we really tried to run this test.
>  		if ((!${#loop_status[*]})); then
>  			try+=("$seqnum")
> @@ -1033,15 +1042,6 @@ function run_section()
>  			done
>  		fi
>  
> -		# Reload the module after each test to check for leaks or
> -		# other problems.
> -		if [ -n "${TEST_FS_MODULE_RELOAD}" ]; then
> -			_test_unmount 2> /dev/null
> -			_scratch_unmount 2> /dev/null
> -			modprobe -r fs-$FSTYP
> -			modprobe fs-$FSTYP
> -		fi
> -
>  		# Scan for memory leaks after every test so that associating
>  		# a leak to a particular test will be as accurate as possible.
>  		_check_kmemleak || tc_status="fail"
> -- 
> 2.46.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-15 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-15 14:54 [PATCH v3 00/10] raid1 balancing methods Anand Jain
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] btrfs: initialize fs_devices->fs_info earlier Anand Jain
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] btrfs: simplify output formatting in btrfs_read_policy_show Anand Jain
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] btrfs: add btrfs_read_policy_to_enum helper and refactor read policy store Anand Jain
2024-12-06 16:47   ` David Sterba
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] btrfs: handle value associated with raid1 balancing parameter Anand Jain
2024-12-06 16:53   ` David Sterba
2024-12-16  9:38     ` Anand Jain
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] btrfs: introduce RAID1 round-robin read balancing Anand Jain
2024-11-18  7:34   ` kernel test robot
2024-12-06 17:13   ` David Sterba
2024-12-16  9:34     ` Anand Jain
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] btrfs: add RAID1 preferred read device Anand Jain
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] btrfs: pr CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL status Anand Jain
2024-12-06 17:16   ` David Sterba
2024-12-16 15:14     ` Anand Jain
2024-12-06 17:18   ` David Sterba
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] btrfs: fix CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL migration Anand Jain
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] btrfs: enable RAID1 balancing configuration via modprobe parameter Anand Jain
2024-11-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] btrfs: modload to print RAID1 balancing status Anand Jain
2024-11-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] fstests: refine filesystem module reload handling Anand Jain
2024-11-15 15:20   ` [PATCH 1/2] fstests: move fs-module reload to earlier in the run_section function Anand Jain
2024-11-15 16:39     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-11-18  0:12       ` Anand Jain
2024-11-15 16:48     ` Filipe Manana
2024-11-15 15:20   ` [PATCH 2/2] fstests: FS_MODULE_RELOAD_OPTIONS to control filesystem module reload options Anand Jain
2024-11-15 16:34     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-15 19:16 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] raid1 balancing methods Filipe Manana
2024-11-18  1:15   ` Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241115163955.GD9425@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox