From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nt.romanrm.net (nt.romanrm.net [185.213.174.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E53B25A2D4 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 09:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.213.174.59 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740475923; cv=none; b=umCup4mv1ogWNz43lF29fZ4GTTCMQzzD7TmhbVcVEcrO9CNjXRM76p7GDLYVKCWOrVIlUNfhFeIyd9JgeqGinM/ZuwtFEL2bciCcaYtIN+fT83wBqZVVRpLsZMYSSyp/fZNN+DXpi3O52QPGiqkC2100vzS914IE/+SyI6FhhpE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740475923; c=relaxed/simple; bh=H3RwkjgI0zxL3/7qSi0N8hz10o3o+4kKzNlA4BV2FBI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lrs6NM4IX2APN0OtKwkirwJJbemIsg3+VRn+BmwobRUQcQHi0n5Z0k+ClCerzUrRRMwjtFPQc+O8I5eVso0BajRbvrMiyRphlhly81t/W+gvOQLxYD/Qnk//+J2Jeh6f6nbBk2miUdcYu9BxtnXX6O4Mjkiyv0UKE26O+3o3yn0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=romanrm.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=romanrm.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.213.174.59 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=romanrm.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=romanrm.net Received: from nvm (umi.2.romanrm.net [IPv6:fd39:a37d:999f:7e35:7900:fcd:12a3:6181]) by nt.romanrm.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 99F2A43416; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 09:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:25:05 +0500 From: Roman Mamedov To: Marc MERLIN Cc: Qu Wenruo , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs , Josef Bacik , Chris Murphy , Zygo Blaxell , Su Yue Subject: Re: BTRFS error (device dm-4): failed to run delayed ref for logical 350223581184 num_bytes 16384 type 176 action 1 ref_mod 1: -117 (kernel 6.11.2) Message-ID: <20250225142505.276af40f@nvm> In-Reply-To: References: <018d16aa-24b2-43ae-826c-7f717e0d05ee@gmx.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 01:18:57 -0800 Marc MERLIN wrote: > I do not have the system with me right now and I think memtest cannot be > run from inside linux, correct? > If so, I can do this when I get home and can reboot the system. > > Or is there a version I can run from inside linux? There is memtester: https://pyropus.ca./software/memtester/ But it can't test 100% of the RAM, only the free userspace area that it can allocate. You should close down most apps and then give it (as a parameter) as high amount as possible, without it getting killed by OOM. It could catch very obvious faults, and it is a good "something to do" for now :) but for the complete rigorous test you'll need the baremetal memtest86+. -- With respect, Roman