public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	clm@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 019/114] btrfs: avoid linker error in btrfs_find_create_tree_block()
Date: Mon,  5 May 2025 19:16:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250505231817.2697367-19-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250505231817.2697367-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>

[ Upstream commit 7ef3cbf17d2734ca66c4ed8573be45f4e461e7ee ]

The inline function btrfs_is_testing() is hardcoded to return 0 if
CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS is not set. Currently we're relying on
the compiler optimizing out the call to alloc_test_extent_buffer() in
btrfs_find_create_tree_block(), as it's not been defined (it's behind an
 #ifdef).

Add a stub version of alloc_test_extent_buffer() to avoid linker errors
on non-standard optimization levels. This problem was seen on GCC 14
with -O0 and is helps to see symbols that would be otherwise optimized
out.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 9cef930c4ecfb..8498994ef5c6d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -5134,10 +5134,10 @@ struct extent_buffer *find_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
 struct extent_buffer *alloc_test_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 					u64 start)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
 	struct extent_buffer *eb, *exists = NULL;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -5173,8 +5173,11 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_test_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 free_eb:
 	btrfs_release_extent_buffer(eb);
 	return exists;
-}
+#else
+	/* Stub to avoid linker error when compiled with optimizations turned off. */
+	return NULL;
 #endif
+}
 
 struct extent_buffer *alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 					  u64 start)
-- 
2.39.5


       reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250505231817.2697367-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-05-05 23:16 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-05-05 23:16 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 020/114] btrfs: send: return -ENAMETOOLONG when attempting a path that is too long Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250505231817.2697367-19-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maharmstone@fb.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox