From: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: use fs_info as the block device holder
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 10:05:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250605170431.GA3475402@zen.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c2f064770e5bf7a78d768b3e0a2cad9643169d7.1749116730.git.wqu@suse.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 07:15:48PM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Currently btrfs uses "btrfs_fs_type" as the bdev holder for all opened
> device, which means all btrfses shares the same holder value.
>
> That's only fine when there is no blk_holder_ops provided, but we're
> going to implement blk_holder_ops soon, so replace the "btrfs_fs_type"
> holder usage, and replace it with a proper fs_info instead.
>
> This means we can remove the btrfs_fs_info::bdev_holder completely.
I definitely support this, I always found it quite weird that we had a
single generic holder and relied on our own checking to ensure we only
mount each device once. I think this should help insulate us from
bizarre fsid bugs like we've seen with seed+sprout in the past.
However, I'm a little confused, as I thought Johannes and Christoph made
the change to using the super block as the holder a while ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20231218044933.706042-1-hch@lst.de/
Did that end up failing to get in? Or it got reverted? I don't see it in
the git history.
Those patches have a lot more going on, so I'm also wondering if any of
that is necessary for making this change? Haven't fully refreshed myself
on that old series, though, so it's a fairly naive question. Also, it
does seem like other fs-es uses sb, but I don't have a strong opinion on
that and don't see why fs_info can't work.
Thanks,
Boris
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/fs.h | 2 --
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 3 +--
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
> index 2decb9fff445..cf63f4b29327 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> }
>
> bdev_file = bdev_file_open_by_path(device_path, BLK_OPEN_WRITE,
> - fs_info->bdev_holder, NULL);
> + fs_info, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(bdev_file)) {
> btrfs_err(fs_info, "target device %s is invalid!", device_path);
> return PTR_ERR(bdev_file);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/fs.h b/fs/btrfs/fs.h
> index b239e4b8421c..d90304d4e32c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/fs.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/fs.h
> @@ -715,8 +715,6 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
> u32 data_chunk_allocations;
> u32 metadata_ratio;
>
> - void *bdev_holder;
> -
> /* Private scrub information */
> struct mutex scrub_lock;
> atomic_t scrubs_running;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index 2d0d8c6e77b4..c1efd20166cc 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ static int btrfs_get_tree_super(struct fs_context *fc)
> fs_devices = device->fs_devices;
> fs_info->fs_devices = fs_devices;
>
> - ret = btrfs_open_devices(fs_devices, mode, &btrfs_fs_type);
> + ret = btrfs_open_devices(fs_devices, mode, fs_info);
> mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -1905,7 +1905,6 @@ static int btrfs_get_tree_super(struct fs_context *fc)
> } else {
> snprintf(sb->s_id, sizeof(sb->s_id), "%pg", bdev);
> shrinker_debugfs_rename(sb->s_shrink, "sb-btrfs:%s", sb->s_id);
> - btrfs_sb(sb)->bdev_holder = &btrfs_fs_type;
> ret = btrfs_fill_super(sb, fs_devices);
> if (ret) {
> deactivate_locked_super(sb);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index d3e749328e0f..606ddf42ddc3 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -2705,7 +2705,7 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path
> return -EROFS;
>
> bdev_file = bdev_file_open_by_path(device_path, BLK_OPEN_WRITE,
> - fs_info->bdev_holder, NULL);
> + fs_info, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(bdev_file))
> return PTR_ERR(bdev_file);
>
> @@ -7168,7 +7168,7 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *open_seed_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> if (IS_ERR(fs_devices))
> return fs_devices;
>
> - ret = open_fs_devices(fs_devices, BLK_OPEN_READ, fs_info->bdev_holder);
> + ret = open_fs_devices(fs_devices, BLK_OPEN_READ, fs_info);
> if (ret) {
> free_fs_devices(fs_devices);
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> --
> 2.49.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 9:45 [PATCH] btrfs: use fs_info as the block device holder Qu Wenruo
2025-06-05 17:05 ` Boris Burkov [this message]
2025-06-05 22:17 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250605170431.GA3475402@zen.localdomain \
--to=boris@bur.io \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox