From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: zoned: fix alloc_offset calculation for partly conventional block groups
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:06:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250605091811.386815-1-jth@kernel.org>
Hi Johannes,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on kdave/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15 next-20250605]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Johannes-Thumshirn/btrfs-zoned-fix-alloc_offset-calculation-for-partly-conventional-block-groups/20250605-171925
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250605091811.386815-1-jth%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: zoned: fix alloc_offset calculation for partly conventional block groups
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250606 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250606/202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250606/202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
ld: fs/btrfs/zoned.o: in function `btrfs_load_block_group_raid0':
>> fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1531: undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
ld: fs/btrfs/zoned.o: in function `btrfs_load_block_group_raid10':
fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1592: undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
vim +1531 fs/btrfs/zoned.c
1504
1505 static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid0(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
1506 struct btrfs_chunk_map *map,
1507 struct zone_info *zone_info,
1508 unsigned long *active,
1509 u64 last_alloc)
1510 {
1511 struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info;
1512
1513 if ((map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) && !fs_info->stripe_root) {
1514 btrfs_err(fs_info, "zoned: data %s needs raid-stripe-tree",
1515 btrfs_bg_type_to_raid_name(map->type));
1516 return -EINVAL;
1517 }
1518
1519 for (int i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
1520 if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_MISSING_DEV)
1521 continue;
1522
1523 if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_CONVENTIONAL) {
1524 u64 stripe_nr, full_stripe_nr;
1525 u64 stripe_offset;
1526 int stripe_index;
1527
1528 stripe_nr = div64_u64(last_alloc, map->stripe_size);
1529 stripe_offset = stripe_nr * map->stripe_size;
1530 full_stripe_nr = div_u64(stripe_nr, map->num_stripes);
> 1531 stripe_index = stripe_nr % map->num_stripes;
1532
1533 zone_info[i].alloc_offset =
1534 full_stripe_nr * map->stripe_size;
1535
1536 if (stripe_index > i)
1537 zone_info[i].alloc_offset += map->stripe_size;
1538 else if (stripe_index == i)
1539 zone_info[i].alloc_offset +=
1540 (last_alloc - stripe_offset);
1541 }
1542
1543 if (test_bit(0, active) != test_bit(i, active)) {
1544 if (!btrfs_zone_activate(bg))
1545 return -EIO;
1546 } else {
1547 if (test_bit(0, active))
1548 set_bit(BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_ZONE_IS_ACTIVE, &bg->runtime_flags);
1549 }
1550 bg->zone_capacity += zone_info[i].capacity;
1551 bg->alloc_offset += zone_info[i].alloc_offset;
1552 }
1553
1554 return 0;
1555 }
1556
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 9:18 [PATCH v2] btrfs: zoned: fix alloc_offset calculation for partly conventional block groups Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-06 0:06 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox