From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED993081A2 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 12:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756814988; cv=none; b=E1KBSq0/EHiaA5F4MCRGQ/YqntYxhcdtSl5Wq7OUVAAFEQaYkC223c5jCm6dj7upNZJEPLsI++GpNOdlvwcbT2f4A0PnzzKGvClnx1M/ArtJpLC3LSTAHNOJBtVK40pju3tpOw1GuveE+xI40mvOsmYWWqZyPvCLdbcxA77siMI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756814988; c=relaxed/simple; bh=umubb5ja5btA3FbvGDpT5snjrja/6XWb0oS/xFx1UIs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tU/X0cw0yHVk6UgRuMkjk/MXu27pAZz8tsaDAk2aIVAdxCoy6upZMsohWn3mfoPJ2XgQHyLzwaE+vE4GrNxiXJcemeyUk62Ja4vBbsK5+Brk6dO5B4rbdIzf15FjZ9NZawviI72/EuuCptCzqcKkEn+gr42CPhspVBL66gSBKEY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b=PPkL9AVq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=18.9.28.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b="PPkL9AVq" Received: from trampoline.thunk.org (pool-173-48-82-217.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.82.217]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 582C9W11030330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Sep 2025 08:09:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1756814974; bh=3hW8MI6wgp2erDa+pJ+0tZiB1LWGKb5iv9yqhJYhwrw=; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PPkL9AVqYZIPNZypDXFeUkzC+MEPjbfdo6d2hcFndA6O3PzjFhRcyhsh0WOczMSAw /zw7509uJjhGPQnqh1PeFQUOcB6L7DbwHwfa1pAjkP+uSYa65up6193429f4oYNn5o z9nVWOamCfN8JyylBpGwdPSKHbhb8pNhjYavHiTdxwWpm0Mcxp3JMNrBywFghuChJf jHmIM3jysoBx1OIiZXPFIy9/34mKqAZlwSXgNfZ9+VT90+awOqpMnMslx+p4imkhj6 HUrM4ZDZGGdP7aEUc7ncNLwu+nv4eESo6XKkU2OdmJaTXjnqgpcmx5KAHps2rSNpvq oP8epkAWd5z2g== Received: by trampoline.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 82E452E00D6; Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:09:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 08:09:32 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Qu Wenruo Cc: "fstests@vger.kernel.org" , linux-btrfs , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Golden output mismatch from generic/228, fs independent Message-ID: <20250902120932.GA2564374@mit.edu> References: <60b73970-9cb6-49b1-ad5f-51ab02ef2c98@gmx.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <60b73970-9cb6-49b1-ad5f-51ab02ef2c98@gmx.com> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 08:00:32PM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I updated my arm64 VM, and now several test cases are failing due > to golden output mismatch. > > This time it's fs independent, and I haven't yet updated fstests itself, so > it looks like some updates in my environment is breaking the test. > > E.g, generic/228 on ext4 (the same on btrfs) > > I checked my log, bash/xfsprogs and a lot of other packages are all updated, > and unfortunately my distro doesn't provide older packages for me to > bisect... I don't know if this helps, but here's a kvm-xfstests using Debian Trixie and certain updated critical packages (fio, quota, xfsprogs, util-linux, etc.) overriden. How does that differ from your distro package versions? I haven't updated my arm64 image in a bit (this was from dated July 20th). I can try doing an arm64 rebuild and see if a newer version still works on arm64, but here's a data point.... - TEd KERNEL: kernel 6.17.0-rc3-xfstests #1 SMP Tue Sep 2 07:57:28 EDT 2025 aarch64 CMDLINE: --arm64 -c ext4/4k generic/228 CPUS: 2 MEM: 1977.09 ext4/4k: 1 tests, 5 seconds generic/228 Pass 2s Totals: 1 tests, 0 skipped, 0 failures, 0 errors, 2s FSTESTVER: blktests 401420a (Fri, 6 Jun 2025 22:12:43 +0900) FSTESTVER: fio fio-3.40 (Tue, 20 May 2025 12:23:01 -0600) FSTESTVER: fsverity v1.6-2-gee7d74d (Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:41:58 -0800) FSTESTVER: ima-evm-utils v1.5 (Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:40:07 -0500) FSTESTVER: libaio libaio-0.3.108-82-gb8eadc9 (Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:33:11 +0200) FSTESTVER: ltp 20250130-280-g60656cbbb (Wed, 28 May 2025 15:04:44 +0200) FSTESTVER: quota v4.05-71-g4cd93fc (Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:24:24 -0400) FSTESTVER: util-linux v2.41-40-g22b91501d (Mon, 26 May 2025 11:27:31 +0200) FSTESTVER: xfsprogs v6.15.0 (Mon, 23 Jun 2025 13:56:41 +0200) FSTESTVER: xfstests v2025.07.13-12-gef63d1368 (Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:14:29 -0400) FSTESTVER: xfstests-bld gce-xfstests-202504292206-20-g905451c1 (Sun, 20 Jul 2025 03:04:27 +0000) FSTESTVER: zz_build-distro trixie FSTESTCFG: ext4/4k FSTESTSET: generic/228 FSTESTOPT: aex Truncating test artifacts in /results to 31k